2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life after laparoscopic and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: A comparison study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
32
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 L-RPLND has demonstrated improved convalescence and quality of life compared with open RPLND. 10,11 In similar fashion, a report on robot-assisted L-RPLND will continue to increase the minimally invasive nature of the procedure. 12 In a comprehensive review of the current status of L-RPLND, 13 the strengths and limitations of the approach were portrayed and indicated that longer oncologic follow-up is necessary for this promising approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…8,9 L-RPLND has demonstrated improved convalescence and quality of life compared with open RPLND. 10,11 In similar fashion, a report on robot-assisted L-RPLND will continue to increase the minimally invasive nature of the procedure. 12 In a comprehensive review of the current status of L-RPLND, 13 the strengths and limitations of the approach were portrayed and indicated that longer oncologic follow-up is necessary for this promising approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Under ideal conditions, RPLND provides excellent results (i.e., 90% survival with low long-term toxicity). 21 However, patients might be exposed to surgery-associated side effects such as retrograde ejaculation. The relapse rate after RPLND is between 5.8% and 21% in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, complicaciones postoperatorias menores iniciales y tardías fueron significantemente altas en la LR. Los pacientes de LRL estuvieron bastante menos tiempo ingresados, tuvieron mejores escalas de calidad de vida y mayor rapidez en el retorno a la vida diaria 15 . Abdel-Azi et al compararon su experiencia basada en 28 pacientes que fueron sometidos a LR (6 pacientes) o LRL (22 pacientes) para TCGNS en estadio clínico I.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified