Quality of Leadership and Workplace Bullying: The Mediating Role of Social Community at Work in a Two-Year Follow-Up Study

Francioli, Laura; Conway, Paul Maurice; Hansen, Åse Marie; Holten, Ann-Louise; Grynderup, Matias Brødsgaard; Persson, Roger; Mikkelsen, Eva Gemzøe; Costa, Giovanni; Høgh, Annie

doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2996-3

Cited by 41 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Four studies have examined the moderators in psychosocial working conditions–bullying relationships. Francioli et al (2015) found the moderating role of sense of coherence (SOC) in the relationship between psychosocial working conditions (assessed through JDC model, Karasek, 1979) and bullying. This study revealed that SOC, which is a reflection of a general individual ability to select appropriate coping strategies in the face of stressors, has the potential to weaken the relationship between psychosocial working conditions and bullying.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of literature on mediators and moderators of workplace bullying

Rai

Agarwal

2018

MRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose During the past 26 years, there has been a phenomenal growth in the literature on workplace bullying. The purpose of this paper is to review and synthesize the extant empirical studies on underlying and intervening mechanisms in antecedents–bullying and bullying–outcomes relationships. Design/methodology/approach In total, 53 studies on mediators and moderators in antecedents–bullying and bullying–outcomes relationships (2001-2016) were selected from academic databases (Google Scholar, Research Gate, Emerald Insight, Science Direct, etc.) Findings The review suggests that while a reasonable number of studies examine the role of mediators and moderators in bullying–outcomes relationships, such efforts are meager in antecedents–bullying relationships. The paper concludes by proposing some potential variables that can explain the underlying mechanisms in the bullying phenomenon and alleviate/aggravate the antecedents–bullying–outcomes relationships. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first review on mediators and moderators of workplace bullying.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of literature on mediators and moderators of workplace bullying

Rai

Agarwal

2018

MRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The scholars inspired from his arguments, claim that bullying is a consequence of the prevailing organizational culture, job design, interpersonal relationship between the employees, team culture, and social environment within organizations (Astrauskaite et al, 2014; Baillien et al, 2012; Einarsen et al, 2018; Zapf & Einarsen, 2011, etc.). The presumption of bad leadership is most likely linked to more and more cases being reported of WB (Francioli et al, 2018). Scholars also found an association between bullying and autocratic or tyrannical leader behavior.…”

Section: What Recent Wb Research Concludesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Known and Unknown Aspects of Workplace Bullying: A Systematic Review of Recent Literature and Future Research Agenda

Gupta

Wadhwa

2020

Human Resource Development Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Last decades showed a high interest in studying the workplace bullying (WB) phenomenon in a variety of disciplines and in a number of WB areas such as concepts and forms of WB, antecedents and consequences of WB, WB interventions, etc. This study offers classification and description of current WB literature, and identifies research gaps to be bridged by further empirical research. In the first part, authors systematically review 167 refereed journal articles, classify the WB research into five main research themes and summarize their findings. In the second part, the article uncovers various unknown aspects of WB and provides concrete directions for future empirical research. Thrust areas of attention are highlighted for industry and policy makers.

show abstract

“…Three main aspects can be deciphered from this revised version, i.e., work-related bullying, person-related bullying, and physical intimidation [50]. The NAQ-R has been used in more than 100 further studies [3] in approximately 40 countries with different occupational settings [4,52]. The NAQ-R is available with no cost from a research team, the Bergen Bullying Research Group at University of Bergen, Norway.…”

Section: Workplace Bullying Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of Workplace Bullying: Reliability and Validity of Indonesian Version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R)

Erwandi

Kadir

Lestari

2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bullying can pose a risk to health and safety, including the risk for damage to the emotional, psychosocial, mental, or physical health of employees in the workplace. Since bullying has a detrimental impact on victims and organizations, several studies on this issue had been conducted using the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R), which is one of the most widely used tools to assess and minimize the occurrence of workplace bullying. However, this tool has not been validated for the Indonesian contexts. In this study, the author tested the reliability and constructed validity of the Indonesian version of NAQ-R. A total of 3140 participants were recruited in this study from various companies from different industries. NAQ-R, Psychosocial Distress (K10), and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) were administrated through an online survey. The results showed that 22 items yielded three model factors, i.e., person-related bullying, work-related bullying, and intimidation towards a person. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the total and sub-scales of the Indonesian NAQ-R was acceptable, ranging from 0.721 to 0.897. This study confirmed that the Indonesian version of NAQ-R has an internal consistency reliability, and the concurrent and construct validity are at acceptable levels. Thus, this tool can be used as the screening instrument in assessing workplace bullying.

show abstract

Quality of Leadership and Workplace Bullying: The Mediating Role of Social Community at Work in a Two-Year Follow-Up Study

Cited by 41 publications

References 62 publications

A review of literature on mediators and moderators of workplace bullying

A review of literature on mediators and moderators of workplace bullying

Known and Unknown Aspects of Workplace Bullying: A Systematic Review of Recent Literature and Future Research Agenda

Identification of Workplace Bullying: Reliability and Validity of Indonesian Version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About