2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-010-0041-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of hurdle treated pork sausages during refrigerated (4 ± 1°C) storage

Abstract: Pork sausages developed using hurdle technology was evaluated during refrigerated storage (4 ± 1°C). Hurdles incorporated were low pH, low water activity, vacuum packaging and post package reheating. Dipping in potassium sorbate solution prior to vacuum packaging was also tried. Hurdle treatment signifi cantly (p <0.05) reduced the rate of deterioration of quality characteristics of pork sausages during storage, as indicated by TBARS and tyrosine values. Incorporation of hurdles decreased the growth of differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition was supported by (16). Findings were also reported in the experiment on hurdle treated pork sausages (17) where the pH ranged from 6.1 to 6.4, depending on the sample. The lower pH value of sausages could be attributed to the low pH of native chicken and rabbit meat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This condition was supported by (16). Findings were also reported in the experiment on hurdle treated pork sausages (17) where the pH ranged from 6.1 to 6.4, depending on the sample. The lower pH value of sausages could be attributed to the low pH of native chicken and rabbit meat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The increase in FFA on storage in the sausages was in accordance with Modi et al. (2004) and Thomas et al. (2010) who observed a linear increase in FFA content in buffalo meat burgers and pork sausages, respectively, during storage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…An increase in tyrosine value during the storage period might be because of an increase in microbial load and enhanced production of proteolytic enzymes in the late logarithmic phase of microbial growth. (Thomas et al, 2010). In the entire storage period, REþBE treated group had a significantly lower tyrosine value than the control.…”
Section: Chemical Parametermentioning
confidence: 85%