2017
DOI: 10.1111/ors.12263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of healthcare information on the Internet: the case of Apicectomies

Abstract: Background: Patientsoften have misconceptions about the appropriateness of an Apiceptomy, partly due to poor quality information on the Internet. Clinical consequences include a patient's false expectations of preserving a tooth that is of a poor prognosis or conversely the loss of a tooth that had the potential to be saved. Aim: To assess the quality of information available for patients on Apicectomy. Materials and methods: We conducted a quality assessment of online information relating to Apicectomies usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a self-regulatory tool that relies on codes of ethics, the HONcode may be limited in the sense that “self-regulation does not deter the unscrupulous, those who mostly need to have their ethical standards raised [78] (p. 236)”. Specifically, it has been noted that studies utilizing HONcode reported incorrect data as it concerned criteria adherence and assessment [79,80,81]. Nevertheless, we submit said limitations of the HONcode principles, for instance, to be less a reflection of the instrument as an unfit measure of ensuring high ethical standards and more so the result of either limited accountability or a lack thereof on the part of web sites engaged in distributing health-related content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As a self-regulatory tool that relies on codes of ethics, the HONcode may be limited in the sense that “self-regulation does not deter the unscrupulous, those who mostly need to have their ethical standards raised [78] (p. 236)”. Specifically, it has been noted that studies utilizing HONcode reported incorrect data as it concerned criteria adherence and assessment [79,80,81]. Nevertheless, we submit said limitations of the HONcode principles, for instance, to be less a reflection of the instrument as an unfit measure of ensuring high ethical standards and more so the result of either limited accountability or a lack thereof on the part of web sites engaged in distributing health-related content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Health information on the internet is used in a multitude of ways, including as a second opinion, to determine when to access care, and to inform lifestyle changes [10]. However, with such a wide range of information available over Web, the quality of health information is often mixed and inaccurate [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…young adults, college graduates, high‐income households). Since the advent of the Internet, health has become one of the most commonly searched‐for topics (Houston & Ehrenberger, ; Parvizi, Talai, & Parvizi, ). Access to accurate and consistent health information is crucial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of health information available online pertaining to specific issues (e.g. HIV/AIDS, vaccination, venomous snake bites) has been extensively evaluated (Barker, Charlton, & Holstege, ; Faasse, Chatman, & Martin, ; Kalichman et al, ; Kata, ; Meleo‐Erwin, Basch, MacLean, Scheibner, & Cadorett, ; Seeman, Ing, & Rizo, ), with many studies highlighting gaps in the information provided (Parvizi, Talai, & Parvizi, ). The variability and relative utility of some assessment tools have also been noted (Beaunoyer et al, ; Fahy, Hardikar, Fox, & Mackay, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%