2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students' understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
205
0
53

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
205
0
53
Order By: Relevance
“…Seidel [49] reveals that the differences in students' motivational learning outcomes relate to perceived learning conditions in mathematics classrooms such as instructional clarity and interaction with the teacher. Based on a theoretical conceptualization of learning as a self-directed process, in which teachers provide learning opportunities that must be perceived and utilized by students [17,50], in the present study we expected to find distinct student subtypes with respect to perceived instructional quality corresponding to the subtypes of motivational learning outcomes as shown by Seidel [49]. Thus, we expected to find a subtype of learners with overall positive perceptions of the characteristics of instructional quality in math class.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Instructional Quality Mathematics Self-comentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Seidel [49] reveals that the differences in students' motivational learning outcomes relate to perceived learning conditions in mathematics classrooms such as instructional clarity and interaction with the teacher. Based on a theoretical conceptualization of learning as a self-directed process, in which teachers provide learning opportunities that must be perceived and utilized by students [17,50], in the present study we expected to find distinct student subtypes with respect to perceived instructional quality corresponding to the subtypes of motivational learning outcomes as shown by Seidel [49]. Thus, we expected to find a subtype of learners with overall positive perceptions of the characteristics of instructional quality in math class.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Instructional Quality Mathematics Self-comentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The basic dimension of cognitive activation refers to characteristics of instruction, which promote students' conceptual understanding by including, for example, challenging tasks or enhancing different solution strategies and nonroutine problem solving [17]. Additionally, discursive effectiveness, which refers to students' opportunity to coconstruct knowledge by participating in mathematics classroom discourse, is viewed as a mechanism to activate cognitive processing [18,45].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Instructional Quality Mathematics Self-comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few studies have focused on domain-specific teaching practices and examined pre and post-tests to establish a causal direction to interpret the effects of teaching practices on students' outcomes (see also Kunter et al, 2007;Lipowsky, et al, 2009). None (to our knowledge) have looked specifically at representational competence although there is now widespread acceptance of its importance with science practice and education (Yore & Hand, 2010).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no study we know of has empirically analysed the interactive relationship between RC and content knowledge (CK) and only a few studies have analysed how teaching practices in authentic classroom settings affect RC (e.g., Hubber, Tytler, & Hastam, 2010;Kohl & Finkelstein, 2006;Prain & Waldrip, 2006;Tytler, Prain, & Peterson, 2007). This is surprising as there is strong evidence that students' cognitive and affective outcomes are REPRESENTATIONAL COMPETENCE IN BIOLOGY CLASSES 3 generally influenced by teaching practices and instructional quality (e.g., Fraser, 2003;Kunter, Baumert, & Köller, 2007;Lipowsky et al, 2009;Schroeder et al, 2011). Therefore, we argue that it is crucial to incorporate an explicit representational focus in teaching and learning science as a part of domain-specific instructional quality in order to develop students' RC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%