1997
DOI: 10.1007/s003740050356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of different mulch materials and their decomposition and N release under low moisture regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Agroforestry being a people ori ented program, farmer's preference should be acknowledged, but the performance of these species is needed to be scientifically assessed with due attention in terms of nutri ent return efficiency for further promotion. However, nutrient return from a tree is influ enced by quantity, quality (nutrient composi tion) and rate of leaching and decomposition of plant litter (Senevirante et al 1998, Kwa biah et al 2001. Leaf litter is the main and quick source of nutrient return to the soil compared to other litter components (Tukey 1970, Wetzel & Manny 1972, Mason 1977, Dahm 1981, Park & Hyun 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agroforestry being a people ori ented program, farmer's preference should be acknowledged, but the performance of these species is needed to be scientifically assessed with due attention in terms of nutri ent return efficiency for further promotion. However, nutrient return from a tree is influ enced by quantity, quality (nutrient composi tion) and rate of leaching and decomposition of plant litter (Senevirante et al 1998, Kwa biah et al 2001. Leaf litter is the main and quick source of nutrient return to the soil compared to other litter components (Tukey 1970, Wetzel & Manny 1972, Mason 1977, Dahm 1981, Park & Hyun 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the presence or absence of mulch on the soil surface or the spreading of fragments in the soil, modifies the physical, biological and chemical properties of soil, such as water content, temperature, O 2 content (Allmaras et al 1996), N content, pH and the composition of the decomposer community (Holland and Coleman 1987). The reduced rate of decomposition usually observed under field conditions on the surface (Seneviratne et al 1998) may be attributed to a limited contact between soil and plant residues. Under controlled conditions, differences related to residue placement appear unclear and sometimes contradictory depending on the duration of incubation or the residue quality (Cogle et al 1989;Tester 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it must be considered that some of the C input already mineralized after it was incorporated into the soil because in organic systems the soil tillage operations (including sowing the CC) were made in the end of August and at the beginning of September when there was no frost, thus the climatic conditions did not inhibit the mineralization. The mineralization was also promoted because the decomposition of buried residues is generally faster than of surfaceplaced plant residues (Seneviratne et al, 1998;Coppens et al, 2006). This is due to a moisture because which is moisture is best stored in soil plant residues (Parr and Papendick, 1978).…”
Section: Table 13mentioning
confidence: 99%