Quality of Care Perceived by Older Patients and Caregivers in Integrated Care Pathways With Interviewing Assistance From a Social Robot: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background Society is facing a global shortage of 17 million health care workers, along with increasing health care demands from a growing number of older adults. Social robots are being considered as solutions to part of this problem. Objective Our objective is to evaluate the quality of care perceived by patients and caregivers for an integrated care pathway in an outpatient clinic using a social robot for patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) interviews versus the currently used professional interviews. Methods A multicenter, two-parallel-group, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial was used to test for noninferiority of the quality of care delivered through robot-assisted care. The randomization was performed using a computer-generated table. The setting consisted of two outpatient clinics, and the study took place from July to December 2019. Of 419 patients who visited the participating outpatient clinics, 110 older patients met the criteria for recruitment. Inclusion criteria were the ability to speak and read Dutch and being assisted by a participating health care professional. Exclusion criteria were serious hearing or vision problems, serious cognitive problems, and paranoia or similar psychiatric problems. The intervention consisted of a social robot conducting a 36-item PROM. As the main outcome measure, the customized Consumer Quality Index (CQI) was used, as reported by patients and caregivers for the outpatient pathway of care. Results In total, 75 intermediately frail older patients were included in the study, randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups, and processed: 36 female (48%) and 39 male (52%); mean age 77.4 years (SD 7.3), range 60-91 years. There was no significant difference in the total patient CQI scores between the patients included in the robot-assisted care pathway (mean 9.27, SD 0.65, n=37) and those in the control group (mean 9.00, SD 0.70, n=38): P=.08, 95% CI –0.04 to 0.58. There was no significant difference in the total CQI scores between caregivers in the intervention group (mean 9.21, SD 0.76, n=30) and those in the control group (mean 9.09, SD 0.60, n=35): P=.47, 95% CI –0.21 to 0.46. No harm or unintended effects occurred. Conclusions Geriatric patients and their informal caregivers valued robot-assisted and nonrobot-assisted care pathways equally. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03857789; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03857789

Friends from the Future: A Scoping Review of Research into Robots and Computer Agents to Combat Loneliness in Older People

“…Other social robots have supported older adults with daily healthcare and companionship needs using touch-screen interactions, 26 and more recently with assessment interviews in care pathways using verbal conversational abilities. 27 Computer agents are screen-based, computergenerated entities 28 that may include a dialogue system and a digital embodiment (eg, an animation of a human face on a screen). 29 Examples include embodied conversational agents, virtual agents, digital humans, and game characters.…”

“…Other social robots have supported older adults with daily healthcare and companionship needs using touch-screen interactions, 26 and more recently with assessment interviews in care pathways using verbal conversational abilities. 27 …”

Robots in Healthcare: a Scoping Review

“…Pepper is a humanoid robot with a touch screen, capable of interacting with people through conversation. Boumans et al [ 27 ] explored the use of Pepper in outpatient clinics with a randomised clinical trial. They compared human and Pepper-mediated patient interviews and evaluated patient perception following this.…”

Enhancing Nurse–Robot Engagement: Two-Wave Survey Study

“…Boumans et al [ 41 ] verified the benefits of an assistive social robot. Our study is in line with theirs in examining the benefits of assistive robots in health care contexts.…”

“…However, our study examined new benefits; that is, saving labor by carrying heavy equipment and materials. Such benefits could positively contribute to nurses’ health [ 13 ], which improves their performance [ 41 ].…”