The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Handbook of Healthcare Analytics 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119300977.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients might still experience differences in quality of care even though all of them are survivors (or non‐survivors), and by focusing on mortality only, we neglect these nuances. Quality of care is an inherently debatable concept, and there are different views on how to conceptualize and operationalize it (Song & Veeraraghavan, 2018 ; Wiig et al., 2014 ). The set of quality indicators reported by hospitals varies among hospitals and over the years, and the definitions of the indicators change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients might still experience differences in quality of care even though all of them are survivors (or non‐survivors), and by focusing on mortality only, we neglect these nuances. Quality of care is an inherently debatable concept, and there are different views on how to conceptualize and operationalize it (Song & Veeraraghavan, 2018 ; Wiig et al., 2014 ). The set of quality indicators reported by hospitals varies among hospitals and over the years, and the definitions of the indicators change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating outcomes and behavior into patient flow optimization. Improving patient outcomes is vital for hospitals’ operations, especially in the era of value‐based care (Burwell 2015, Song and Veeraraghavan 2018). While traditional service operations mainly target for improving operational improvement (e.g., shortening waiting time, increasing throughput), there has been a growing interest to account for patient outcomes in hospital operational decisions.…”
Section: Beyond the Single‐pool Model And Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient and physician behavior are clearly influenced. (Axelrod et al 2015) The calendar effect also applies to the first few months of each year: "In the past five years, health Indeed, a growing number of HOM scholars, including, for example, Su and Zenios (2004), Ata et al (2017), , Savva et al (2018), and Song and Veeraraghavan (2018), have recognized the power of queueing games in capturing the endogenous nature of access to healthcare services.…”
Section: Interactions Among Healthcare Providers Payors and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, quality-of-care data for individual clinicians (including physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) have largely been kept secret, despite some aggregate-level data becoming available in recent years. Song and Veeraraghavan (2018) survey HOM research on quality of care, building on which they propose a classification of this literature that consists of structure (e.g., organizational design, resource allocation scheme, and human resource management), process (e.g., length of stay, waiting time, turnaround time, resource utilization, process compliance and deviations), outcome (e.g., mortality, adverse events, readmissions, patient experience, and access). Their survey suggests patients have little access to quality-of-care information, let alone informed decisions in choosing service providers.…”
Section: Interactions Among Clinicians Patients and Hospitalsmentioning
confidence: 99%