2006
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.21.2375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Among Highly Trained Staff in an Emergency Department Setting

Abstract: Highly trained professionals in an emergency department can achieve appropriate chest compression rates during CPR with a low hands-off ratio. Increased attention must be paid in all situations to the avoidance of hyperventilation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…they provided only the overall survival outcome for the entire patient cohort and did not stratify by CPR quality parameter. 19 …”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they provided only the overall survival outcome for the entire patient cohort and did not stratify by CPR quality parameter. 19 …”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The Australian Resuscitation Council (ARC) followed this with the release of the ARC Previous guidelines resulted in too much 'hands-off time' and contributed to poor-quality CPR, 3 with suboptimal chest compression and ventilation rates 5 correlated with poor pos-resuscitation survival rates. 6 ARC Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guideline 7 was amended to increase the number and rate of compressions, minimise interruptions to compressions, and prevent excess ventilation. The ARC ALS guidelines 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] Data in simulated and real patients demonstrate that laypersons, emergency medical services personnel, and health care providers frequently perform poor-quality CCs. 9,10,[15][16][17] Previous adult manikin studies document deterioration of CC quality with time, resulting in markedly diminished levels of effective CCs after as little as 1 minute. [18][19][20] These studies also note that practitioners were unaware of their deterioration in performance and only reported subjective fatigue after 3 to 4 minutes of CCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%