1989
DOI: 10.4141/cjps89-099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Alfalfa Herbage Estimated by a Prepared Cellulase Solution and Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The R 2 between 0.2 to 0.8 g L•• prepared cellulase solution treatments and NIRS spectra was 0.95 or greater. The SEC were acceptable for these prepared cellulase solution treatments and were similar to those reported before (Bughrara et al, 1989). The 0.8 g L-1 cellulase treatment was the most preferable treatment to estimate tall fescue IVDMD.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The R 2 between 0.2 to 0.8 g L•• prepared cellulase solution treatments and NIRS spectra was 0.95 or greater. The SEC were acceptable for these prepared cellulase solution treatments and were similar to those reported before (Bughrara et al, 1989). The 0.8 g L-1 cellulase treatment was the most preferable treatment to estimate tall fescue IVDMD.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The activity of crude cellulase has been generally measured by the degree of filter paper decomposition (Mandels and Weber, 1969). Bughrara et al (1989) indicated that the ideal assay to evaluate activity of a prepared cellulase solution should be simple and related to conditions under which the enzymes are to be used. They evaluated apparent activity of a prepared cellulase solution by digesting forage standards of known IVDMD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This treatment was similar to the procedure outlined in Number 7 except the cellulase we used was produced by Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals Co. (Indianapolis, IN). Apparent digestibility (IVDMD) was determined by a two-stage rumen fermentation procedure as described by Bughrara et al (1989). Fifteen milliliters of citrate buffer solution was added to each 50-milliliter glass tube contain- were injected into each tube with a hypodermic syringe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%