1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1684(98)00127-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality measurement and use of pre-processing in image compression

Abstract: Traditional quality measures for image coding, such as the p e a ksignal to noise ratio, assume that the preservation of the original image is the desired goal. However, pre-processing images prior to encoding, designed to remove noise or unimportant detail, can improve the overall performance of an image coder. Objective image quality metrics obtained from the di erence b e t ween the original and coded images cannot properly assess this improved performance. This paper proposes a new methodology for quality … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low quality digital images can seriously affect the way an image is interpreted, introducing errors in analysis or eliminating the image's usefulness in a industrial or medical environment. [1][2][3][4]6,8,9,11,13,17 The fundamental problem of image enhancement is that every person judges the quality of an image differently. When manipulating and enhancing images, there is not one ideal outcome that will satisfy everyone as every person has a different subjective perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low quality digital images can seriously affect the way an image is interpreted, introducing errors in analysis or eliminating the image's usefulness in a industrial or medical environment. [1][2][3][4]6,8,9,11,13,17 The fundamental problem of image enhancement is that every person judges the quality of an image differently. When manipulating and enhancing images, there is not one ideal outcome that will satisfy everyone as every person has a different subjective perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%