2006
DOI: 10.1177/1460458206061230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality labelling of medical web content

Abstract: As the number of medical web sites in various languages increases, it is more than necessary to implement control measures that give the consumers adequate guarantee that the health web sites they are visiting, meet a minimum level of quality standards and that the professionals offering the information on the web site are responsible for its contents. The paper presents the current mechanisms for labelling medical web content and introduces the work done in the EC-funded projects Quatro and MedIEQ. Quatro has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Angel et al work on a system that measures the quality of medical websites [17,23]. Eysenbach analyzed health-related searches on the World Wide Web [9] and reported that in Google 6.75 Million health-related searches per day are conducted.…”
Section: Analysis and Assessing Social Media Data In Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angel et al work on a system that measures the quality of medical websites [17,23]. Eysenbach analyzed health-related searches on the World Wide Web [9] and reported that in Google 6.75 Million health-related searches per day are conducted.…”
Section: Analysis and Assessing Social Media Data In Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prior publications have addressed the use of RDF approaches to improve biomedical data annotation. Mayer et al, for example, use an RDF schema to assist in labelling the quality standards of medical websites 27 . Another paper by Mayer et al describes a platform to automatically generate metadata descriptions that can be used to label the trustworthiness of the content of medical websites 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the quality of these websites is very difficult to assess and evaluate (Mayer et al 2005 …”
Section: Data Acquisition (Health On Net Foundation)mentioning
confidence: 99%