2009
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0b013e3181a0848b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Issues in Interpretation of Optical Coherence Tomograms in Macular Diseases

Abstract: Artifacts causing erroneous reported centerpoint thickness are common. Identifying clues that indicate suboptimal quality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images are important to avoid erroneous interpretation of OCT data in clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Artifacts that create erroneous thickness reports occur in around 15% of OCT scans in eyes with DME (in both TD-and SD-OCT) [12][13][14]. The main artifacts seen are boundary (segmentation) line errors and decentration.…”
Section: Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Artifacts that create erroneous thickness reports occur in around 15% of OCT scans in eyes with DME (in both TD-and SD-OCT) [12][13][14]. The main artifacts seen are boundary (segmentation) line errors and decentration.…”
Section: Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In some cases, this may make the assessment whether the macular measurement grid is appropriately centered on the fovea difficult. The net effect of these artifacts is inaccuracy in the instrument-generated retinal thickness measurements [12]. Clinicians should be knowledgeable about such problems to determine the reliability of an individual's retinal thickness measurements.…”
Section: Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the issues encountered in Trial 1 we believe could have been avoided had our reading centre been involved at the beginning of the MS clinical trial. Signal strength and the presence of artifacts have been shown to affect RNFL thickness measurements using Stratus OCT. [15][16][17]30,31 In summary, the quantitative data and examples in Figures 1 to 4 demonstrate the utility of an OCT reading centre in MS clinical trials using OCT technology to monitor MS patients with RNFL or macula volume changes. To optimise data quality, it seems essential for an OCT reading centre to be involved from the earliest planning stages of the trial to ensure technicians are properly certified for OCT testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these artifacts have been recognized to cause breakdown in the performance of the segmentation software and thus leading to incorrect automated retinal thickness measurements (Ho et al, 2009;Ray et al, 2005;Sadda et al, 2006). Several studies have pointed out that segmentation breakdown may also be possible in high quality scans if there are pathological features such as full-thickness macular hole, pigment epithelial detachment, subretinal fluid, retinal fibrosis and hard exudates (Domalpally et al, 2009;Ho et al, 2009;Krebs et al, 2009;Sadda et al, 2006). The presence of media opacities (cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, ect.)…”
Section: Oct Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%