2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality infrastructure and natural disaster resiliency: A panel analysis of Asia and the Pacific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with contemporary literature (Taghizadeh-Hesary et al, 2021), the impact of natural disaster is contingent on a plethora of factors, inter alia, the level of economic development, a justification that is consistent with some strands of the literature that, the consequences of negative signals such as terrorism are more apparent in poor countries which do not have the infrastructure and logical sophistication to hedge the corresponding negative effects (Asongu & Ssozi, 2017;Asongu & Kodila-Tedika, 2019). Khan et al (2020) have assessed the Belt and Road Initiative and established a negative nexus between natural disasters and economic prosperity in terms of gross domestic product (GDP), and GDP per capita.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Consistent with contemporary literature (Taghizadeh-Hesary et al, 2021), the impact of natural disaster is contingent on a plethora of factors, inter alia, the level of economic development, a justification that is consistent with some strands of the literature that, the consequences of negative signals such as terrorism are more apparent in poor countries which do not have the infrastructure and logical sophistication to hedge the corresponding negative effects (Asongu & Ssozi, 2017;Asongu & Kodila-Tedika, 2019). Khan et al (2020) have assessed the Belt and Road Initiative and established a negative nexus between natural disasters and economic prosperity in terms of gross domestic product (GDP), and GDP per capita.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Some studies have also underlined that good quality hard infrastructure (such as energy infrastructure, including electricity and transport) is essential for bolstering countries' resilience to economic and financial shocks, as well as natural disasters (e.g., Di Caro and Ugo 2018;Hallegatte 2014;Taghizadeh-Hesar et al 2021;United Nations 2016). In light of the potential adverse effects of natural disasters on international trade flows, including exports (e.g., Gassebner et al 2010;Oh and Rafael 2010), we expect the development of hard infrastructure to be associated with greater export resilience.…”
Section: Theoretical Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very important to make these economies resilient to natural disasters, by spending more money on their prevention namely by "investing in Disaster Risk Reduction for resilience" through collaboration between public and private entities and "enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response" and to "Build Back Better in recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction" (UNISDR, 2019). The prevention policy for making these economies resilient includes the establishment of quality infrastructure (Taghizadeh-Hesary et al, 2020).…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%