2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
200
0
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
200
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates that a studentcentred investigative approach may reveal useful data on student preferences and behaviour, in the context of blended learning, including aspects of motivation and interest, and that studies on online technology and materials can be complimented by seeking to understand students' perceptions of their learning environments. In line with Ginns and Ellis (2007), this study highlights the importance of understanding student perceptions of the online lesson and how they support learning within the framework of the whole course.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It indicates that a studentcentred investigative approach may reveal useful data on student preferences and behaviour, in the context of blended learning, including aspects of motivation and interest, and that studies on online technology and materials can be complimented by seeking to understand students' perceptions of their learning environments. In line with Ginns and Ellis (2007), this study highlights the importance of understanding student perceptions of the online lesson and how they support learning within the framework of the whole course.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Ginns and Ellis (2007), for instance, in an extensive meta-analysis study, linked positive student perceptions of blended learning with comparatively higher grades, and concluded that teachers using blended learning must understand student perceptions of online learning and how it supports learning across a whole course.…”
Section: Student Perception and Satisfaction With Online Lessonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transferring knowledge and the effectiveness of clinical teaching-learning strategies lies in facilitating student engagement through promoting a diversity of experiences, creating shared learning opportunities, maximizing student-faculty interaction, involving students in active learning, and setting high expectations [26] . There is a positive impact of collaborative learning [27,28] , blended learning [29] , shared-learning experiences [30,31] , and technologies [32][33][34][35][36] for improving the engagement of students and development of capabilities. Students reported increased engagement in self-directed clinical learning activities like e-learning [37] and web based learning [38] for developing critical reasoning processes, and conveyed that learning was more dynamic and active compared to the learning experienced in the conventional curricula [35] .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While online learning ensures flexibility and competency which are difficult to ensure in a real class setting, face to face education enables social interaction which is required as guidance for students. Some studies underlined that technology and interaction type should be taken into consideration in order to design effective, attractive and efficient learning environments (Karadeniz 2009;Bliuc et al 2007;Ginns and Ellis 2007). The best aspects of both face to face and online learning and the integration of e-learning into traditional learning programs with the development of new delivery communication technology systems have created blended learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%