2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26209-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Improvement in Behavioral Health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 240 publications
(312 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear exactly what the optimal trial rate is and how it changes for different patients with different clinical profiles. Nevertheless, opportunities for quality improvement typically present themselves where variability in provider performance or patient outcomes are observed (e.g., O'Donohue & Maragakis, 2016;Porter & Teisberg, 2006). ABA organizations can use these data to compare how their rate of trial variability compares, the factors that might influence their own variability, and to determine what is optimal for each patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear exactly what the optimal trial rate is and how it changes for different patients with different clinical profiles. Nevertheless, opportunities for quality improvement typically present themselves where variability in provider performance or patient outcomes are observed (e.g., O'Donohue & Maragakis, 2016;Porter & Teisberg, 2006). ABA organizations can use these data to compare how their rate of trial variability compares, the factors that might influence their own variability, and to determine what is optimal for each patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%