Quality Improvement and Infrastructure Activity Costs in Software Development: A Longitudinal Analysis

Abstract

This study draws upon theories of task interdependence and organizational inertia to analyze the effect of quality improvement on infrastructure activity costs in software development. Although increasing evidence indicates that quality improvement reduces software development costs, the impact on infrastructure activities is not known. Infrastructure activities include services like computer operations, data integration, and configuration management that support software development. Because infrastructure costs represent a substantial portion of firms' information technology budgets, it is important to identify innovations that yield significant cost savings in infrastructure activities. We evaluate quality and cost data collected in nine infrastructure activity centers over 10 years of product development in a major software firm undergoing a quality transformation. Findings indicate that infrastructure activities do benefit from quality improvement. The greatest marginal cost savings are realized in infrastructure activities that are highly interdependent with development and that occur later in the software development life cycle. Organizational inertia influences the rapidity with which the infrastructure activities benefit from higher product quality, especially for the more specialized activities. Finally, our findings suggest that although the savings in infrastructure from quality improvement are substantial, there are diminishing returns to quality improvement in infrastructure activities.Infrastructure Activity Costs, Software Product Development, Software Process Improvement, Software Quality, Capability Maturity Model, Organizational Inertia

A Hierarchy of SPI Activities for Software SMEs: Results from ISO/IEC 12207-Based SPI Assessments

“…Software process maturity is "the extent to which a specific software process is explicitly defined, managed, measured, controlled and effective" [3], with higher levels of process maturity being associated with higher product quality, reduced production costs [4], and with increased predictability of the process results [5], [6]. Although process maturity reference frameworks can deliver benefits to any type of software development organisation, evidence from earlier studies suggests their adoption would appear to be mostly concentrated in large organisations [7], [8].…”

Are Foreign IT Workers Cheaper? U.S. Visa Policies and Compensation of Information Technology Professionals

“…Among high-skill workers, IT professionals who create the IT infrastructure to support critical business processes of firms (Ang and Slaughter 2000, Bartol and Aspray 2006, Ferratt et al 2005, Harter and Slaughter 2003, Josefek and Kauffman 2003) are particularly susceptible to the forces of globalization. Arguably, because many ITrelated jobs also involve high information intensity and often few requirements for physical presence, these jobs are amenable to global disaggregation and can be performed remotely or offshore (Apte and Mason 1995).…”

The Influence of Software Process Maturity and Customer Error Reporting on Software Release and Pricing

“…This positive relationship between process maturity and quality as well as other software development characteristics has also been established in the academic literature (see, e.g., Harter et al 2000, Harter andSlaughter 2003). Hence, by understanding how bug density interacts with the trade-offs that affect software release which are described above, we can provide broad implications on how firms at a given level of process maturity should manage software adoption and even identify the value that underlies achieving a higher level of maturity.…”

“…Recent empirical studies (Harter et al 2000, Krishnan et al 2000, Harter and Slaughter 2003, Harter et al 2012) document a positive relationship between process maturity and software quality and further identify in which circumstances the effect of maturity is relatively even greater. Following both industry evidence and convention in the literature, we also assume this relationship,B/Y = σ(γ), exists where we use defect density for convenience and σ(γ) has the following properties: ∂σ/∂γ < 0, σ(0) =σ < ∞, and σ(1) = 0.…”