2010
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality-Evaluation Scheme for Cerebral Time-Resolved 3D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Techniques

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:No practical tool has been reported in the literature to evaluate the quality of cerebral TR-3D-CE-MRA techniques. Our study assessed a large list of parameters used to propose a quality-evaluation scheme for TR-3D-CE-MRA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Image quality was evaluated by assigning a diagnostic confidence index and artifact score (3,16) for time-resolved SL MR angiographic imaging, TOF, and time-resolved CE MR angiographic imaging. The diagnostic confidence index was scored for overall image quality and each AVM component (arterial feeders, nidus and venous drainage) as follows: 0, not helpful for the diagnosis; 1, poor imaging quality with bad depiction of the vascular architecture and hemodynamic information, but can be helpful for the diagnosis; 2, adequate image quality with detailed vascular architecture and hemodynamic information that allows for diagnosis; and 3, high imaging quality with clearly detailed vascular architecture and hemodynamic information that allows for definite diagnosis.…”
Section: Advances In Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image quality was evaluated by assigning a diagnostic confidence index and artifact score (3,16) for time-resolved SL MR angiographic imaging, TOF, and time-resolved CE MR angiographic imaging. The diagnostic confidence index was scored for overall image quality and each AVM component (arterial feeders, nidus and venous drainage) as follows: 0, not helpful for the diagnosis; 1, poor imaging quality with bad depiction of the vascular architecture and hemodynamic information, but can be helpful for the diagnosis; 2, adequate image quality with detailed vascular architecture and hemodynamic information that allows for diagnosis; and 3, high imaging quality with clearly detailed vascular architecture and hemodynamic information that allows for definite diagnosis.…”
Section: Advances In Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation criteria included: 1) delineation of vessels (arteries, veins, nidus); 2) homogeneity of vascular signal intensity; 3) streak or motion artifacts; 4) overlap of arterial and venous structures and 5) diagnostic confidence. The grading system is described in Table 1 (25, 26), intermediate grades (i.e. 3.5) were allowed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the image quality of both techniques was evaluated on visual and quantitative criteria. The visual criteria were evaluated overall for all visible arteries, and also focusing on the origin and intracranial part of the internal carotid arteries (ICA) . The criteria together with their score are provided in Table .…”
Section: Mr Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%