2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1007-0214(10)70004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality evaluation of image recording strategies for limited angle tomography

Abstract: In this paper we propose a new method for evaluating image recording strategies for limited angle tomography. In limited angle tomography exact three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction is not achievable. With this method a metric for the reachable reconstruction quality by defined X-ray source trajectories is calculated. The result of our method is independent of reconstruction algorithms. Our approach is based on the gradients of the scanned volume and their grade of determinability. Compared to simulated recon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work could include detailed comparison between different analytical FOMs (e.g., Refs. 20, 3135) in terms of their correlation with zmod and/or other empirical task-based sampling completeness metrics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future work could include detailed comparison between different analytical FOMs (e.g., Refs. 20, 3135) in terms of their correlation with zmod and/or other empirical task-based sampling completeness metrics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the fraction is 1.0, then Tuy’s condition is satisfied at that voxel, and fractions <1.0 correspond to an increased potential for cone-beam artifact at that location. Other authors 33 , 34 computed a FOM that can accommodate a finite number of source locations or as a continuous trajectory: for each plane passing through the voxel, the sine of the angle of the nearest source location is calculated, and an angle of zero means that the plane contains an x-ray source location; averaging these values over all planes 33 (or alternatively, taking the maximum value 34 ) provides a FOM that correlates with sampling completeness at that location. Alternatively, the information for each plane need not be combined, and the angular values corresponding to all planes intersecting the voxel are considered in full 11 , 35 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was pointed out in [28] that this metric provided necessary completeness condition (which is equivalent to saying the metric provides a sufficient incompleteness condition). Other variations include averaging | cos ψ i | over all (so a value of 1 at location x indicates data completeness) [24], and taking the maximum value of| sin ψ i | over all θ as an incompleteness metric [31]. The metric we propose here has been previously described in conference proceedings papers [18], [17], [19], [46] but as a heuristic approach to defining resolution in tomographic reconstructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, Stopp et al proposed an "image recording quality measure" q(x) for applications in limited-angle X-ray scanning [24]. The quality measure q(x) was similar in spirit to an averaged version of R(x, θ) described above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation