2016
DOI: 10.5120/ijca2016908340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality evaluation of apple fruit: A Survey

Abstract: Disease recognition has been huge research area nowadays because inspection of quality of fruits at an early stage prevents spreading of disease to the other areas of fruit as well as helps to reduce great economic losses in agricultural sectors and industries. Different types of diseases exist in different fruits. The focus of the present research work is on quality evaluation of apple fruit. The basic process for defect detection in fruits is basically divided into two major steps; feature extraction and cla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a number of sources, it follows that the average fructose content in ripe apple fruits ranges from 5.9-12.6 g, glucose -2.43-5.35 g and sucrose -1.90-4.70 g [8][9][10][11]. At the same time, the authors note that the fructose content in seed crops (which also includes apple trees) is 2-3 times higher than the glucose content; the amount of sucrose is most often equal to the glucose content, but as apples mature, the glucose content decreases [12][13][14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a number of sources, it follows that the average fructose content in ripe apple fruits ranges from 5.9-12.6 g, glucose -2.43-5.35 g and sucrose -1.90-4.70 g [8][9][10][11]. At the same time, the authors note that the fructose content in seed crops (which also includes apple trees) is 2-3 times higher than the glucose content; the amount of sucrose is most often equal to the glucose content, but as apples mature, the glucose content decreases [12][13][14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of this method is more than 90%. Komal Sindhi and Jaymit Pandya [5] have mainly focus on evaluating the quality of fruits. In this article, the four most common diseases of the apple have been observed.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apple fruit has few internal diseases that cannot identify by physical observation. (Komal Sindhi et al, 2016). [1] Different non-destructive technologies are available to detect internal defects on agricultural products and the advantages and disadvantages of using different technologies like X-ray, NIR, Sonic/ Ultrasonic method, and MRI on Mangoes fruit diseases (Anita Raghavendra et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Komal Sindhi et al, 2016). [1] Different non-destructive technologies are available to detect internal defects on agricultural products and the advantages and disadvantages of using different technologies like X-ray, NIR, Sonic/ Ultrasonic method, and MRI on Mangoes fruit diseases (Anita Raghavendra et al, 2016). [2] Modern challenges in food science require an understanding of the new determinants of the quality and safety of food products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%