Quality cost management in the SMEs of Poland

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study is to examine the research problem that represents an attempt to approximate the importance of quality costing in managing a modern enterprise using the selected enterprises from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Poland.Design/methodology/approachThe primary goal of the research is a need to acquire knowledge about the use of quality cost accounts in enterprises operating in Poland. The research has been conducted in the SMEs of production and services. From October 2018 to December 2018, survey-based research was carried out in the selected SMEs of production and service in Poland. The targeted participants of the study are from the medium-sized enterprises, employing 50–250 people.FindingsThe pilot studies conducted in companies indicate that modern enterprises are focused on quality. Many enterprises declare to be continuously improving quality system and quality costing. However, generally, these are large companies that have implemented ISO standards, often part of international corporations. The survey result of the study shows that medium-sized enterprises still make little use of modern cost accounting variants. Based on the study, only 9.75% (39 enterprises) from a representative group of 400 companies from the sectors of manufacturing, services and production as well as service companies apply quality costing. Some of the other enterprises are only taking measures to implement quality cost accounting.Research limitations/implicationsThe research has been conducted in randomly selected SMEs in the form of a questionnaire interview. In order to further analyze the construction of quality cost management (QCM) systems and the use of information from QCM by enterprises, case study method should be used more widely.Practical implicationsThe results of the study provide useful help for companies that are quality-oriented and want to implement quality costing. The survey has been conducted in 400 enterprises, and the survey results of considered SMEs reveal the most important aspects of the application of quality costing.Originality/valueThe questionnaire used, the answers provided and the resulting conclusions fill the identified research gap. In the author's opinion, findings of research are relevant and useful, not only for accounting practice but also for theory. They show that although TQM and quality costing have been very popular in the literature since the 1990s, the degree of application of quality costing in practice (except for large, often international companies) is too low. So, the suitability of QCM in managing a modern enterprise from the SMEs should be promoted.

Quality Improvement Design at Islamic Schools Post-Covid-19 Pandemic in Elementary School and Integrated Early Childhood Education of Saleh Children, Malang City

“…People need educational institutions that are outstanding or are deemed a high value or quality. Efforts to make continuous improvements can be referred to as quality (Biadacz, 2021). Given that science and technology have become an inseparable unit, so that people flock to high-value educational institutions according to their needs.…”

“…Its position as the principal capital of a system significantly influences the process and results. So to measure the effectiveness of a process, appropriate inputs and outputs are needed (Biadacz, 2021).…”

Firm Performance Indicators as a Fundamental Analysis of Stocks and a Determinant of a Firm’s Operation

“…It should be used in planning and improving firms' performance and improvement of cost activities. The company should emphasize to ensure that operating costs is effectively obtained and improved the cost management in many departments of company (Kiani et al, 2009;Biadacz, 2020).…”

The specificity of the functioning of the quality cost account within the quality management system of an enterprise

“…In enterprises, there are often problems with the unambiguous identification of quality costs, because not all of them are obvious, which makes it difficult to accurately measure and quantify them. On numerous occasions, managers only see costs that are easy to measure, and which are really only the tip of the iceberg, while the real costs of poor quality in operations and delivery of a product or service lie below the Surface and contribute most to the loss of quality (Biadacz, 2020;Cheah, et al, 2011;Durmaz and Sevil, 2012;Wood, 2007). Among other things, the hard-to-identify hidden costs, the elimination of which could positively affect the competitive position of the enterprise, include delays in order fulfillment, deterioration of the company's reputation, loss of customers, increased overheads and liability payments (Rosenfield, 2009;Durmaz and Sevil, 2012).…”