2008
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2008.6.172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality control in the analysis of lake sediments for spheroidal carbonaceous particles

Abstract: The use of spheroidal carbonaceous particles (SCPs) in environmental studies as a means to identify atmospherically deposited contamination, or as a technique to provide a chronology for lake sediment cores, is rapidly increasing. However, currently there are no internationally accepted quality controls for this methodology. No reference standard exists to provide inter-calibration, and no standardized criteria for identification have been proposed. This paper addresses these issues. It is suggested that morph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A known fraction of this suspension was then evaporated onto a coverslip and the number of SCPs counted using a light microscope at 9400 magnification. Criteria for SCP identification under the light microscope followed Rose (2008). SCP concentrations were expressed as the number of particles per gram dry mass of sediment (g -1 dm).…”
Section: Sediment Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A known fraction of this suspension was then evaporated onto a coverslip and the number of SCPs counted using a light microscope at 9400 magnification. Criteria for SCP identification under the light microscope followed Rose (2008). SCP concentrations were expressed as the number of particles per gram dry mass of sediment (g -1 dm).…”
Section: Sediment Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCP concentrations were expressed as the number of particles per gram dry mass of sediment (g -1 dm). Analytical blanks and SCP reference material (Rose 2008) were included in each batch of sample digestions. The detection limit for the technique is typically less than 100 g -1 dm and the calculated concentrations generally have an accuracy of c. ± 45 g -1 dm.…”
Section: Sediment Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were then transferred to vials, centrifuged and glycerol was added. Samples were mounted on a slide and SCP and charcoal concentrations were counted under a light microscope against a frequency of 50, 75 or 100 Lycopodium following the protocols of Rose (2008). SCP and charcoal frequency were calculated as numbers of particles per g dry mass.…”
Section: Scps and Charcoalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A known fraction of this suspension was then evaporated onto a coverslip, mounted onto a glass slide, and the number of SCPs was counted using a light microscope at 400× magnification. Standard criteria for SCP identification were followed (Rose, 2008). SCP concentrations were calculated in units of 'number of particles per gram dry mass of sediment' (gDM −1 ) and SCP fluxes as 'number of particles per cm 2 per year' (cm −2 yr −1 ).…”
Section: Spheroidal Carbonaceous Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCP concentrations were calculated in units of 'number of particles per gram dry mass of sediment' (gDM −1 ) and SCP fluxes as 'number of particles per cm 2 per year' (cm −2 yr −1 ). Analytical blanks and SCP reference material (Rose, 2008) were included with sample digestions. The detection limit for the technique is typically less than 100 gDM −1 , and calculated concentrations generally have a precision of c. ±45 gDM −1 .…”
Section: Spheroidal Carbonaceous Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%