2015
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elv037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality control, imputation and analysis of genome-wide genotyping data from the Illumina HumanCoreExome microarray

Abstract: The decreasing cost of performing genome-wide association studies has made genomics widely accessible. However, there is a paucity of guidance for best practice in conducting such analyses. For the results of a study to be valid and replicable, multiple biases must be addressed in the course of data preparation and analysis. In addition, standardizing methods across small, independent studies would increase comparability and the potential for effective meta-analysis. This article provides a discussion of impor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants were genotyped on the Psych Chip (Illumina Infinium PsychArray-24). Data quality was controlled in PLINK v1.07 (Purcell et al, 2007) using the same parameters as described in Coleman et al (2016). SNPs were excluded when missingness > 1%, minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.01 or Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) < 0.00001 and participants were excluded when missingness > 1%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants were genotyped on the Psych Chip (Illumina Infinium PsychArray-24). Data quality was controlled in PLINK v1.07 (Purcell et al, 2007) using the same parameters as described in Coleman et al (2016). SNPs were excluded when missingness > 1%, minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.01 or Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) < 0.00001 and participants were excluded when missingness > 1%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cohorts were subject to quality control and imputation separately, as described in Coleman et al [24]. In short, the data was filtered to ensure a minor allele frequency of greater than 5% for all SNPs before removal of rare variants and subjects with high levels of missing data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data quality was controlled in PLINK v1.07 (Purcell et al, 2007) using the same parameters as described in Coleman et al (2016) and Dima, de Jong, Breen, and Frangou (2016). Data quality was controlled in PLINK v1.07 (Purcell et al, 2007) using the same parameters as described in Coleman et al (2016) and Dima, de Jong, Breen, and Frangou (2016).…”
Section: Polygenic Risk Score Telomere Length (Prs-tl) Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA extracted from buccal swabs was genotyped on the Psych Chip (Illumina Infinium PsychArray-24). Data quality was controlled in PLINK v1.07 (Purcell et al, 2007) using the same parameters as described in Coleman et al (2016) and Dima, de Jong, Breen, and Frangou (2016). To generate polygenic risk scores for telomere length (PRS-TL), we obtained the genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from the largest TL GWAS to-date (Codd et al, 2013).…”
Section: Polygenic Risk Score Telomere Length (Prs-tl) Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%