2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality control and whole-gland, zonal and lesion annotations for the PROSTATEx challenge public dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study describes 60 stable, uncorrelated and non-invariant radiomics features, extracted from MRI images, which previously underwent a quality assessment [ 16 ], and used to distinguish significant from non-significant prostate cancer lesions through an ML approach. Firstly, a univariate statistical analysis was performed to prove that these 60 features were useful in distinguishing the lesions by themselves (16 of them were revealed to be statistically significant).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present study describes 60 stable, uncorrelated and non-invariant radiomics features, extracted from MRI images, which previously underwent a quality assessment [ 16 ], and used to distinguish significant from non-significant prostate cancer lesions through an ML approach. Firstly, a univariate statistical analysis was performed to prove that these 60 features were useful in distinguishing the lesions by themselves (16 of them were revealed to be statistically significant).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 299 verified prostate lesions were included in this study. Specifically, the lesion annotation masks were obtained from an online open repository ( , accessed on 1 July 2020) and coupled with the source MRI images, which can be found in the PROSTATEx training dataset ( , accessed on 1 July 2020) [ 16 , 17 ]. The ground-truth of the public dataset is obtained with a manual annotation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regrettably, to the best of our knowledge, there are no public and annotated repositories for other pelvic cancer types (MRI or CT) and RT target volumes. Whilst global and institutional efforts are necessary to initiate public repositories, appropriate quality control and external expert auditing need to be in place to ensure data are of high quality [179,180].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Availability of high-quality public databases including imaging, histopathologic and genomic data could be a solution, allowing researchers to reproduce and replicate their results on larger scale [ 85 ]. However, these are challenging to collect and share, and still require quality checks to ensure their validity and representativeness of the general population over time [ 86 , 87 ]. Moreover, the lack of standardization in AI pipelines, imaging acquisition parameters and segmentation methods also negatively impact reproducibility and comparability between studies.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%