1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01253480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality competition, welfare, and regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
103
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
11
103
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If utility is linear in income, equilibrium quality coincides with the socially optimal level. This result is well known from the literature (Ma and Burgess, 1993;Gravelle, 1999) and is due to the marginal utility being equal for the marginal and average consumer. 2;3 However, if utility is strictly concave in income, the marginal utility is higher for the marginal than for the average consumer in the Nash equilibrium, implying that the equilibrium supply of quality is below the socially optimal level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If utility is linear in income, equilibrium quality coincides with the socially optimal level. This result is well known from the literature (Ma and Burgess, 1993;Gravelle, 1999) and is due to the marginal utility being equal for the marginal and average consumer. 2;3 However, if utility is strictly concave in income, the marginal utility is higher for the marginal than for the average consumer in the Nash equilibrium, implying that the equilibrium supply of quality is below the socially optimal level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Our results show that the total e¤ect depends crucially on the marginal utility of income. If the marginal utility is constant, the two e¤ects cancel each other out and the equilibrium quality level is independent of t, as in Ma and Burgess (1993) and Gravelle (1999). However, if utility is strictly concave, the indirect e¤ect on quality incentives through a lower price-cost margin is reduced, implying that lower non-monetary transportation costs will increase the equilibrium supply of quality.…”
Section: Transportation Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, for the function H. The arguments 2 ; :::; N in G and H include r 1 and q 1 , so if we partially di¤erentiate G or H with respect to r 1 and q 1 , we get the summation terms in (16) and (17). However, for j = 2; :::; N , r j and q j are only in the argument j in G and H. When we partially di¤erentiate G or H with respect to r j or q j , we only get the simpler expressions in (18) and (19). )…”
Section: Qualities and Equilibrium Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%