2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2022.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality comparison of recombinant soluble proteins and proteins solubilized from bacterial inclusion bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While initially inclusion bodies (IBs) were thought to be aggregates of misfolded protein ( García-Fruitós et al, 2012 ), they have been shown to contain correctly folded secondary and tertiary protein structures, in some cases even with biological activity ( García-Fruitós, 2010 ; Villaverde et al, 2015 ; Belkova et al, 2022 ; López-Cano et al, 2022 ). Preserving these existing structures during the solubilization step has been correlated with an increase in refolding yield due to reduced re-aggregation ( Singh et al, 2015 ; Kachhawaha et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Mild Inclusion Body Solubilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While initially inclusion bodies (IBs) were thought to be aggregates of misfolded protein ( García-Fruitós et al, 2012 ), they have been shown to contain correctly folded secondary and tertiary protein structures, in some cases even with biological activity ( García-Fruitós, 2010 ; Villaverde et al, 2015 ; Belkova et al, 2022 ; López-Cano et al, 2022 ). Preserving these existing structures during the solubilization step has been correlated with an increase in refolding yield due to reduced re-aggregation ( Singh et al, 2015 ; Kachhawaha et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Mild Inclusion Body Solubilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most prominently, alkaline pH is used to increase protein solubility at lower denaturant concentrations ( Khan et al, 1998 ; Patra et al, 2000 ; Singh et al, 2008 ; Lu and Lin, 2012 ; Ishikawa et al, 2022 ). Other chemical options are organic solvents ( Upadhyay et al, 2016 ; Sarker et al, 2019 ; Nekoufar et al, 2020 ) or detergents, like N-lauroyl sarcosine, SDS, CHAPS, and Triton X-100 ( Francis et al, 2012 ; Ishikawa et al, 2022 ; López-Cano et al, 2022 ). Physical methods for mild solubilization include high pressures of up to 2.4 kbar ( Chura-Chambi et al, 2022a ; Chura-Chambi et al, 2022b ) and, most recently, freeze-thaw cycles ( Padhiar et al, 2018 ; Maksum et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Mild Inclusion Body Solubilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to increase protein yield, NLS, a mild detergent with few interferences on biological activity of recombinant proteins was used [ 34 , 35 ]. A more recent publication showed that this detergent may affect protein folding of insoluble proteins [ 36 ], then, the final impact on Blo t 2 is unknown. Despite demonstrating that rBlo t 2 is biologically actively inducing allergic reactions and also similar rates of IgE binding to other similar studies [ 6 , 16 ], physico-chemical characterization of rBlo t 2 will confirm if the recombinant has the optimum folding to represent its natural counterpart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, solubilized IB proteins show antimicrobial activity against E. coli in a dose-dependent fashion against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae embedded in biofilms [ 20 ]. However, it is important to point out that the selection of an optimal mild solubilizer is especially relevant when antimicrobial proteins are purified because recently it has been reported that they can impair the antimicrobial activity [ 81 ].…”
Section: Forms Of Recombinant Hdpsmentioning
confidence: 99%