2020
DOI: 10.33785/ijds.2019.v72i06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality characteristics of ready-to-serve (RTS) thandai beverage during storage

Abstract: The present study was conducted to evaluate the shelf life of traditional Indian composite milk beverage; thandai in ready to serve (RTS) form at refrigeration temperature. Pasteurized thandai drink was prepared using variety of nuts added in appropriate amount using standard methodology. Product was packed in cleaned, sterilized glass bottles with plastic seal on to the top and stored at refrigerated (4±1°C) temperature. The physico-chemical, microbiological, instrumental colour as well as sensory quality of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The L* value did not vary significantly ( P > 0.05) with change in sugar level, however, beverage containing 30% water (73.93 ± 0.55) had significantly ( P < 0.05) higher L * values than 35% (70.12 ± 0.42) and 40% water (60.45 ± 0.36). A reduction in the lightness of the samples with an increase in the level of water could be attributed to a decrease in protein content (Kaur et al ., 2019). Increasing the water level decreased the a* value but increased the b* value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The L* value did not vary significantly ( P > 0.05) with change in sugar level, however, beverage containing 30% water (73.93 ± 0.55) had significantly ( P < 0.05) higher L * values than 35% (70.12 ± 0.42) and 40% water (60.45 ± 0.36). A reduction in the lightness of the samples with an increase in the level of water could be attributed to a decrease in protein content (Kaur et al ., 2019). Increasing the water level decreased the a* value but increased the b* value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%