Quality assurance of endoscopy units

Stebbing, Justin

doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2011.05.004

Cited by 15 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 21 publications

(12 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, rapid service improvements followed in the subsequent years with development of an accreditation process, resulting in majority of the units achieving the required level B across standards 9 . A professionally-led, peer-reviewed accreditation process encouraged uptake and supported teams in achieving the standards 9,10 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Paediatric Endoscopy Global Rating Scale

Narula

Broughton

Howarth

et al. 2019

J. pediatr. gastroenterol. nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The endoscopy Global Rating Scale (GRS) is a web based self-assessment quality improvement tool providing a framework for service improvement. Widespread use of the GRS in adult endoscopy services in the United Kingdom (UK), has led to a demonstrable improvement in quality. The adult GRS is not directly applicable to paediatric endoscopy services. Objectives: To develop and pilot a paediatric endoscopy GRS (P-GRS) as a quality improvement tool. Methods: Members of the British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) Endoscopy Working Group collaborated with the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) to develop the P-GRS. After a period of consultation this was piloted nationally in 9 centres and data was collected prospectively at two census points, May and December 2016. Results: The P-GRS mirrors the adult GRS by dividing care into four domains and includes 19 standards with several measures that underpin the standards. Eight services completed the online P-GRS return in May 2016 and six in December 2016. All pilot sites identified areas that needed improvement and post-pilot reflected on the key challenges and developments. Several positive developments were reported by the pilot sites. Conclusions: The national pilot helped ensure that the P-GRS developed was relevant to paediatric endoscopy services. The pilot demonstrated that even in the first year of engaging with this quality improvement tool, services were starting to identify areas that needed improvement, share best practice documents, put in place quality improvement plans and support greater patient involvement in services.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Paediatric Endoscopy Global Rating Scale

Narula

Broughton

Howarth

et al. 2019

J. pediatr. gastroenterol. nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With regard to quality assurance or quality, Stebbing describes the following quality assurance activities [14]: a. Quality assurance rather than quality control or inspection.…”

Section: Quality Assurancementioning

confidence: 99%

System of Educational Quality Assurance in High School

Malisi¹

2020

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to investigate and understand quality assurance of education in international model school. The focuses of this research is the quality assurance system in SMAN 2 Palangka Raya consisting of: 1) determination standard, evaluation, and monitoring, self-evaluation, external and internal audit and formulation of improving the quality of the school. This research is a qualitative in its approach. This inquiry naturalistic study is also kind of case study. Data are collected by studying documents, conducting interview, and doing observation. All data is analyzed by reducing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusion. The finding of this research are: 1) the implementation of national standard of education of international school model, input: the standard of teacher and administrator 93%, background of master-degree teachers are 10 people, bachelor-degree teachers are 70 people, the teacher communicates in learning process never in English language but in Indonesia the standard of tool and facilities 75%. ICT on the class 30% LCD is not available but in mobile. The library is not equipped with internet and computer. Process: standard of learning process teacher has used CTL just 40% and has used ICT just 40%. Output: standard of graduate competence in non-academic and academic achievement did not meet yet national standard (KKM 65%). Non-academic achievement is still low (just reaching championship in Regency/City level). Evaluation and monitoring are conducted by school headmaster in the form of learning supervision but still not maximum and team of directorate of supervision of the Culture and Education Ministry. Implementation of selfevaluation conducted with filling document which become guiding for setting RPS or SDIP that consist of RKJM and RKT. Implementation of internal audit is still planned but external audit from the team of accreditation board of province and central. The development quality assurance system covers selfdeveloping, teacher, and educator quality and also tool and facilities.

show abstract

“…[5] This study was not intended to compare with existing models such as the Endoscopy Global Rating Scale (GRS), which focuses on both patient satisfaction and facility standards. [19] Our evaluation focused on whether minimum staff and facilities were available. However, the need for a GRSbased quality improvement programme with modifications applied to an LMIC is apparent.…”

Section: Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%