2015
DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-14-00207.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Assessment Techniques Applied to Surface Radial Velocity Maps Obtained from High-Frequency Radars

Abstract: This paper presents examples of the data quality assessment of surface radial velocity maps obtained from shore-based single and multiple high-frequency radars (HFRs) using statistical and dynamical approaches in a hindcast mode. Since a single radial velocity map contains partial information regarding a true current field, archived radial velocity data embed geophysical signals, such as tides, wind stress, and near-inertial and lowfrequency variance. The spatial consistency of the geophysical signals and thei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial data availability of the radial velocities at each radar (IMWN and IMWS) and of the vector currents over a period of 1 year (2013) is shown in Figures a–c, respectively. The spatial data availability at a single location represents the number of observations normalized by the total number of time stamps (i.e., 8,544 realizations are performed in 1 year) (Kim, ). The effective study area is marked with a gray curve in Figures c and c, based on the quality assurance and quality control (QAQC) of the radial velocities (Appendix ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spatial data availability of the radial velocities at each radar (IMWN and IMWS) and of the vector currents over a period of 1 year (2013) is shown in Figures a–c, respectively. The spatial data availability at a single location represents the number of observations normalized by the total number of time stamps (i.e., 8,544 realizations are performed in 1 year) (Kim, ). The effective study area is marked with a gray curve in Figures c and c, based on the quality assurance and quality control (QAQC) of the radial velocities (Appendix ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal data availability of the radial velocities at each radar (IMWN and IMWS) and of the vector currents for the same time period is shown in Figures d and e, respectively. Similarly, the temporal data availability at a single time represents the number of observations normalized by the maximum of the expected number of radial solutions or vector solutions (Kim, ). Based on the definitions of spatial and temporal data availability, a value of zero indicates that no data are available and a value of one indicates that complete data are available over the given domain or at a given time.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This network consists of two 25‐MHz radars located at Namhae (NAM4; sans-serifR1) and Hyangil (HYIL; sans-serifR2) and two 44‐MHz radars located at Namhae Sports Park (NHSP; sans-serifR3) and Odong‐do (ODNG; sans-serifR4; Figure c; Table ). The spatial and temporal availability of the radial velocity data, which are processed with respect to the measured beam patterns, at the individual radar sites during the 2‐year period are shown in Figure (see Kim, , for more details). The effective spatial data availability reflects the footprint of the coastline boundary, which is related to the land interference and reduction in the radar signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR; Figures a‐d).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate the correlations of the paired radial velocities and the standard deviations of their sums (e.g., Kim, 2015), but this approach may have limitations because there are places in which the paired radial velocities are persistently absent in our study domain; these absences can yield the anomalous correlations and standard deviations.…”
Section: 1029/2018jc014892mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These radial velocity maps were optimally interpolated into a surface vector current map with a spatial resolution of 1 km using an exponential correlation function with an isotropic decorrelation length scale of 2 km to minimize spatial smoothing (Kim et al, ; Figure a). The uncertainty of the HFR‐derived surface currents in the study area is less than 6 cm normals1, which was estimated from the standard deviations of the sum of the oppositely facing radial velocity pairs sampled at nearby radial grid points by two independent radars (e.g., Kim, ; Kim et al, ; Paduan et al, ). An hourly averaged radial velocity was obtained from a temporal mean of at most six samples of the radial velocities within 1 h because of the irregular occurrence of missing data in both time and space (e.g., Kim et al, ; Schmidt, ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%