1988
DOI: 10.1109/35.7665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assessment of speech coding and speech synthesis systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equation states that 2 is the sum of unexplained variance in the estimation model, MOS estimation error due to limited number of listeners, and bias error between subjective and objective MOSs. In comparing estimation algorithms using the same databases, σ 2 MOS is an irreducible noise term affecting all the algorithms equally. Tables 6 and 7 show that PESQ produces large values on databases Exp1D, Exp3A, and Exp3D, even though R is quite high for databases Exp1D and Exp3D.…”
Section: Database Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equation states that 2 is the sum of unexplained variance in the estimation model, MOS estimation error due to limited number of listeners, and bias error between subjective and objective MOSs. In comparing estimation algorithms using the same databases, σ 2 MOS is an irreducible noise term affecting all the algorithms equally. Tables 6 and 7 show that PESQ produces large values on databases Exp1D, Exp3A, and Exp3D, even though R is quite high for databases Exp1D and Exp3D.…”
Section: Database Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online objective measurement is the only viable means of measuring voice quality, for the purpose of real-time call monitoring and control, on a networkwide scale. Other applications of voice quality measurement include evaluation of disordered speech [1] and synthesized speech [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, people can forget their responses to preserve their self-image or they may say what is considered more socially acceptable (Crosby et al 1980;DeMaio 1984;Edwards 1957;Maass et al 2000;Marlow and Crowne 1961;Paulhus 1984;Roccato and Zogmaister 2010). Moreover, subjects' answers can be distorted unintentionally due to the lack of introspection abilities (Banaji 2001;Boca 1996;Greenwald and Banaji 1995;Kitawaki and Nagabuchi 1998) and the difficulty of verbalizing emotions (Penn 2006). For these reasons, direct techniques are suitable to measure emotions that are definite and conscious and that the subject intends to report truthfully to the researcher (Jacoby et al 1992;Greenwald and Banaji 1995).…”
Section: Neuro and Psychophysiological Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, speech quality assessment has gained increasing importance in multi-media and telecommunication applications, as well as performance evaluation of speech coders [1], text-to-speech synthesis [2] and automatic speech recognition (ASR) [3]. Speech quality can be defined as the subjective opinion of a given speech signal, as determined by the listener [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%