1999
DOI: 10.1080/014311699212560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: A review and a proposal for a cost-based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
154
0
26

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
154
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Error matrices were used to assess classification accuracy using four measures of accuracy: overall accuracy, user's accuracy, producer's accuracy and Kappa statistics. The meaning of and calculation for these terms have been explained in detail in many studies (Congalton 1991;Smits et al, 1999;Plourde and Congalton, 2003;Foody 2002).The user's accuracy indicates the probability that a pixel on the image actually represents that class on the ground (Story and Congalton, 1986). It is calculated for each class by dividing the correctly classified pixels by the row total for that class.…”
Section: Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Error matrices were used to assess classification accuracy using four measures of accuracy: overall accuracy, user's accuracy, producer's accuracy and Kappa statistics. The meaning of and calculation for these terms have been explained in detail in many studies (Congalton 1991;Smits et al, 1999;Plourde and Congalton, 2003;Foody 2002).The user's accuracy indicates the probability that a pixel on the image actually represents that class on the ground (Story and Congalton, 1986). It is calculated for each class by dividing the correctly classified pixels by the row total for that class.…”
Section: Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error matrix is the most widely used approach for image classification accuracy assessment and can be used to derive a series of descriptive and analytical statistics (Congalton and Mead;Congalton, 1991;Congalton and Green, 1999;Smits et al, 1999;Congalton and Plourde, 2002;Foody, 2002;Liu et al, 2007). In this study, accuracy assessment was performed for the classified maps of all three time steps.…”
Section: Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review papers on the use of remote sensing for land use land cover classification are provided in Bastiaanssen (1998), Smits et al (1999), Mucher et al (2000), Cihlar (2000), Franklin and Wulder (2002), Thenkabail et al (2009b), and García-Mora et al (2012).…”
Section: Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'error matrix' (also known as confusion matrix, confusion table, and contingency table) is central to most measures of thematic map accuracy (Story and Congalton, 1986;Smits et al, 1999;Foody, 2004;Powell et al, 2004 andGupta et al, 2008). Once a prediction threshold has been adopted by the mathematical model, the binary prediction (failed/unfailed) can be compared with the landslide observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of approaches have been developed to test the accuracy of landslide spatial prediction maps (Congalton, 1991;Stehman and Czaplewski, 1998;Smits et al, 1999) that can be used to assess the classification maps. The 'error matrix' (also known as confusion matrix, confusion table, and contingency table) is central to most measures of thematic map accuracy (Story and Congalton, 1986;Smits et al, 1999;Foody, 2004;Powell et al, 2004 andGupta et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%