2004
DOI: 10.1080/09638280410001711441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assessment in rehabilitation centres: the indicator system ‘Quality Profile’

Abstract: The indicator system presented is a starting-point for comprehensive, comparative measurement of the quality of in-patient rehabilitation centres that, with regard to its principles, also appears applicable to other areas of health care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
30
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…For this study, detailed data on the organizational features of the centers included in the study were not available, so no hypotheses on the causes of the differences found between the centers can be tested. However, existing publications on the differences among German neurology rehabilitation centers with respect to organizational features and quality criteria (e.g., the existence of guidelines, patient-staff ratio) show that there is a rather high degree of heterogeneity [49,50]. This finding is consistent with the assumption that these features may be potential causes of differences among centers with respect to agreement between patient and provider.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For this study, detailed data on the organizational features of the centers included in the study were not available, so no hypotheses on the causes of the differences found between the centers can be tested. However, existing publications on the differences among German neurology rehabilitation centers with respect to organizational features and quality criteria (e.g., the existence of guidelines, patient-staff ratio) show that there is a rather high degree of heterogeneity [49,50]. This finding is consistent with the assumption that these features may be potential causes of differences among centers with respect to agreement between patient and provider.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Zusman and Slawson (1972) used the term in a service context when they created a quality profile based on an agency's scores as a guide for allocating resources. Farin, Follert, Gerdes, Jäckel, and Thalau (2004) used quality profiles to ensure quality in rehabilitation conditions in healthcare services. Their quality profile consisted of four principles: (i) comprehensive measurement of all relevant quality dimensions, (ii) reporting on three analysis levels and systematic comparisons of centres on the basis of risk adjustment, (iii) agreement and further development of the assessment procedures with the co-operation of clinical experts from the centres involved, and (iv) use of generic and disease-specific measurement instruments.…”
Section: What Is a Quality Profile?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Im Programm der DRV, das von den Initiatoren als "Reha-Qualitätssicherung der Rentenversicherung" bezeichnet wird [14], sind aktuell bis zu zirka 950 Fachabteilungen beteiligt, am "QS-Reha®-Verfahren" der GKV zirka 280 Fachabteilungen [15]. Zu beiden Programmen liegen nationale Publikationen vor, die einen Überblick bieten (zum Beispiel [14,16] beziehungsweise [15,17]), das QS-Reha®-Verfahren wurde auch international vorgestellt [18].…”
Section: Stationäre Rehabilitation Für Erwachseneunclassified