2019
DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1622773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assessment criteria: psychometric properties of measurement tools for cancer related fatigue

Abstract: Background: Fatigue is a common and distressing cancer symptom that negatively affects the quality of life. Many scales have been developed to assess cancer-related fatigue. The properties of the scales vary in terms of dimensionality, reliability, validity, length and method of administration. Insufficient of psychometric properties may affect the accuracy of scales findings, that may lead result obtained questionable. The main objective of this review was to conduct a quality assessment of the psychometric p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be identified using a validated cut-point on a questionnaire with known psychometric properties, e.g. <34 [68] on the FACIT-F [69,80].…”
Section: Recommendations For Research On Physical Activity For Post-cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be identified using a validated cut-point on a questionnaire with known psychometric properties, e.g. <34 [68] on the FACIT-F [69,80].…”
Section: Recommendations For Research On Physical Activity For Post-cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(FACIT-F). 4,5 This questionnaire consists of QoL questions and an additional scale for measuring fatigue. 6 The QoL is known as the Functional Assessment of Cancer TherapyeGeneral (FACT-G).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item generation and review involved patients and oncology specialists and psychometric evidence supports its use in patients with cancer. 56 Responses are summed to create a total score (possible range: 0-52), with higher scores reflecting higher levels of fatigue. We have healthy normative data collected using the FACT-G questionnaire in an Australia population available for comparison.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%