2022
DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_132_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assessment and outcomes related to deceased organ donation in a tertiary care hospital in India an observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of 1277 deaths with these ICD-10 codes, hospitals with an organ donation quality system had significantly more brain deaths than hospitals without such a system (12.04% vs 3.91%). Each hospital should perform systematic analysis of donation potential, with careful assessment of every death from a selected ICD-10 for the possibility of organ donation [1,17]. An up-to-date registry of medical records of all comatose patients (GCS £8 points) increases the number of identified brain-dead patients [10,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of 1277 deaths with these ICD-10 codes, hospitals with an organ donation quality system had significantly more brain deaths than hospitals without such a system (12.04% vs 3.91%). Each hospital should perform systematic analysis of donation potential, with careful assessment of every death from a selected ICD-10 for the possibility of organ donation [1,17]. An up-to-date registry of medical records of all comatose patients (GCS £8 points) increases the number of identified brain-dead patients [10,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each hospital should perform systematic analysis of donation potential, with careful assessment of every death from a selected ICD-10 for the possibility of organ donation [1,17]. An up-to-date registry of medical records of all comatose patients (GCS £8 points) increases the number of identified brain-dead patients [10,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%