2010
DOI: 10.1021/je1002169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Assessment Algorithm for Vapor−Liquid Equilibrium Data

Abstract: A quality assessment algorithm for vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) data has been developed. The proposed algorithm combines four widely used tests of VLE consistency based on the requirements of the Gibbs-Duhem equation, with a check of consistency between the VLE binary data and the pure compound vapor pressures. A VLE data-quality criterion is proposed based on the developed algorithm, and it has been implemented in a software application in support of dynamic data evaluation. VLE predictions (NRTL and UNIFAC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
147
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Figure 4 a very good agreement was found, presenting average absolute deviations of δy = 0.004 and δT = 0.08 K for the vapor phase composition and temperature, respectively. Second, following the strategy suggested by Kang et al, 22 thermodynamic consistency tests were implemented: Herington test (test 1), Van Ness test (test 2), infinite dilution test (test 3), and pure component consistency test. The point test was not used because it is not applicable to isobaric data sets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Figure 4 a very good agreement was found, presenting average absolute deviations of δy = 0.004 and δT = 0.08 K for the vapor phase composition and temperature, respectively. Second, following the strategy suggested by Kang et al, 22 thermodynamic consistency tests were implemented: Herington test (test 1), Van Ness test (test 2), infinite dilution test (test 3), and pure component consistency test. The point test was not used because it is not applicable to isobaric data sets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point test was not used because it is not applicable to isobaric data sets. Following their approach, 22 the overall quality factor (Q) for a VLE data set of acetone/methanol system was about 0.99, where Q VLE = [F pure (F test1 + F test2 + F test3 )]/0.75, showing that the data are of very good quality. Finally, it is important to mention that, when using eq 4 to acetone/methanol system, the fugacity coefficients were obtained in accordance to the Tsonopoulos correlation, 23 calculating the second virial coefficient of pure substances using information available in the DIPPR database.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More adequately, the quality of the experimental data was analyzed by applying a quality assessment algorithm for VLE data proposed by Kang et al [21,22]. Four consistency tests were combined: the Herington test, the Van Ness test, the infinite dilution test, and the pure component test [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Thermodynamic Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum value is 1.0 for the pure component test and 0.25 for the remaining three tests. Then, for each VLE data set, an overall quality factor (Q VLE ) can be calculated as follows [12,21]:…”
Section: Thermodynamic Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 It is also a core component in implementation of the concept of Global Information Systems in Science with application to the field of thermodynamics. 21 Other recent additions include a vapor−liquid equilibrium (VLE) data modeling test that complements consistency tests implemented previously for low-pressure/subcritical VLE data, 15,22 as well as addition of the NIST-KT-UNIFAC prediction method 23 for VLE data, which was developed based on data quality factors (i.e., data set weighting factors) described previously 22 and automatic decomposition of molecular structures into KT-UNIFAC groups and subgroups. 24 The present article describes extension of TDE (version 7, released in 2012) 25 for evaluation of properties of material streams (defined as a mixture with any number of components and specified overall composition).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%