Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China

Abstract

Background: Quality measurements in primary healthcare have become an essential component for improving diabetes outcomes in many high-income countries. However, little is known about their implementation within the Chinese health-system context and how they are perceived by patients, physicians, and policy makers. We examined stakeholders’ perceptions of quality and performance measurements for primary diabetes care in Shanghai, China, and analyzed facilitators and barriers to implementation. Methods: In-depth interviews with 26 key stakeholders were conducted from 2018 to 2019. Participants were sampled from two hospitals, four community healthcare centers (CHCs), and four institutes involved in regulating CHCs. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided data analysis. Results: Existing quality measurements were uniformly implemented via a top-down process, with daily monitoring of family doctors’ work and pay-for-performance incentives. Barriers included excluding frontline clinicians from indicator planning, a lack of transparent reporting, and a rigid organizational culture with limited bottom-up feedback. Findings under the CFIR construct "organizational incentives" suggested that current pay-for-performance incentives function as a "double-edged sword", increasing family doctors’ motivation to excel while creating pressures to "game the system" among some physicians. When considering the CFIR construct "reflecting and evaluating", policy makers perceived the online evaluation application – which provides daily reports on family doctors’ work – to be an essential tool for improving quality; however, this information was not visible to patients. Findings included under the "network and communication" construct showed that specialists support the work of family doctors by providing training and patient consultations in CHCs. Conclusion: The quality of healthcare could be considerably enhanced by involving patients and physicians in decisions on quality measurement. Strengthening hospital–community partnerships can improve the quality of primary care in hospital-centric systems. The case of Shanghai provides compelling policy lessons for other health systems faced with the challenge of improving primary healthcare.

Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mortality burden: Predictions for 2030 based on Bayesian age‐period‐cohort analysis of China and global mortality burden from 1990 to 2019

“…This is managed by community healthcare workers and medical personnel, offering free public health services 65 . In 2016, the Chinese government implemented the ‘Family Doctor Contracted Services’ policy nationwide, encouraging citizens to register with family doctors and promoting the accessibility of Primary Healthcare (PHC) methods in diabetes care 66 . In October 2019, the National Healthcare Security Administration, Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, and National Medical Products Administration jointly issued the ‘Guiding Opinions on Improving the Outpatient Medication Guarantee Mechanism of Hypertension and Diabetes for Urban and Rural Residents’.…”

The impact of hypertension follow-up management on the choices of signing up family doctor contract services: does socioeconomic status matter?

“…First, primary healthcare providers who offered hypertension follow-up management services were also important members of the family doctor team, and they played a critical role in promoting family doctor contracting [ 22 ]. The contracting rate and the percentage of key populations were important indicators for the performance assessment of family doctors [ 38 , 39 ], which became a probable reason for primary health providers to introduce and promote family doctor contract services to older adults with hypertension. Residents who have received publicity for the family doctor contract policy showed a higher willingness to contract with family doctors, especially older adults with chronic diseases such as hypertension [ 13 , 40 ].…”

Rethinking the path from evidence to decision-making

“…Through mapping available strategies, IS-PEC uses updated methodological guidance to provide an evidence-based foundation to guide senior citizens’ engagement in health policy development [ 6 ]. Internationally, IS-PEC’s researchers recently led a knowledge translation initiative with collaborators from Shanghai, China, in implementing evidence-informed quality indicators for primary diabetes care [ 13 ].…”