Quality and continuous improvement in medical device manufacturing

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to compare a range of quality and continuous improvement strategies and to investigate whether there is a best choice of strategy for use within the medical devices sector. Design/methodology/approach -A brief literature-based review of a number of continuous improvement strategies. Comparison of these strategies and a subsequent discussion of the rationale that guides the choice of strategy based on the prevailing conditions. An overview of this process in the context of the medical devices sector is provided. Findings -Quality and continuous improvement strategies can be differentiated in terms of their cultural or process focus. Moreover, the favoured leadership style of an organisation may play a part in determining which strategies are likely to be most appropriate. From the medical device and healthcare product perspective, regulatory and purchasing considerations will have a role in determining the strategy adopted. Practical implications -For managers seeking to implement a strategy for continuous improvement, a review of organisational leadership styles may help the decision -making process. For the medical devices sector, in particular, the need to align the strategy adopted with regulatory requirements is perhaps self-evident. However, only by a detailed understanding of the issues involved in continuous improvement, can all of the attendant benefits be gained. Originality/value -The paper proposes a link between a given organisation's favoured leadership style and the applicability of a particular continuous improvement strategy. The implications for the medical device and healthcare technologies sector are specifically addressed.

The role of supply chain leadership in the learning of sustainable practice: toward an integrated framework

“…There is also positive relationship between transformational leadership and organizational performance such as purchasing cycle time (Hult and Nichols, 1999;Hult et al, 2000b), efficiency and effectiveness (Defee et al, 2009b;. Brown et al (2008) apply a situational leadership model i.e., how empowered a workforce is and how expertise is distributed in a contingency model to inform the selection of different leadership styles which in turn determines continuous improvement strategies e.g., lean or six sigma for the medical devices/equipment sector.…”

Collaborative architecture framework for the design & manufacturing of medical devices

“…One of the most important issues in medical device design and manufacturing is the emphasis on quality which constitutes a big part of this focus [3] III. METHODOLOGY The proposed methodology for product modularization during the conceptual stage follows a systems engineering approach that consists of three phases as shown in Fig.…”

Enablers and inhibitors for sustainability of continuous improvement: A study in the automotive industry suppliers in the Valencia Region

“…En este sentido, a veces se ha asociado como estilo más adecuado el liderazgo carismático (Upton, 1996). Sin embargo, los estilos GI y GII del modelo de Vroom, Yetton y Jago, los estilos participativo o delegante del modelo de Hersey y Blanchard, o el liderazgo transformacional podrían ser también estilos adecuados (Barbuto y Xu, 2006;Bonavía Martín y Quintanilla Pardo, 1994;Bonavía Martín y Quintanilla, 1999;Brown et al, 2008;Burke et al, 2006;Hersey et al, 1998;Lakshman, 2006;Sosik y Dionne, 1997;Vroom y Jago, 1988).…”