2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00331-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality adjusted measures of services in public schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They analyse the average annual percent change in nominal output, real output, employment, output per worker and output per hours of work. Crepon, Duguet and Mairesse (1998) and Lo¨o¨f and Heshmati (2002a;2002b) use value added per employee as the measure of output or services produced. Investment in research and development is an additional input that generates innovation input, which in turn through innovation output affects productivity growth.…”
Section: Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They analyse the average annual percent change in nominal output, real output, employment, output per worker and output per hours of work. Crepon, Duguet and Mairesse (1998) and Lo¨o¨f and Heshmati (2002a;2002b) use value added per employee as the measure of output or services produced. Investment in research and development is an additional input that generates innovation input, which in turn through innovation output affects productivity growth.…”
Section: Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of quality indicators, student, family and municipality characteristics such as student and teacher density, spaces, share of trained teachers, teachers' absence hours, income and education of parents, among others, are included to explain efficiency differentials across municipalities in the provision of their school services. Heshmati (2002b), using Swedish primary and secondary school data at municipality level during the period 1992=93 -1994=95, estimates a cost function. He compares the use of output measured as the number of student enrolments, adjusted for quality differences using different parametric and non-parametric approaches.…”
Section: Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heshmati (2002) uses both a hedonic price and index number approach to including quality characteristics in the estimation of production and cost functions for the data set we use here. In contrast to the approach taken in this paper, Heshmati used quality characteristics to arrive at a quality-adjusted measure of output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an extensive literature about DEA and similar techniques which evaluate school efficiency (e.g. Grosskopf et al, 1999;Bifulco and Bretschneider, 2001;Grosskopf and Moutray, 2001;Portela and Thanassoulis, 2001;Heshmati, 2002;Thanassoulis et al, 2002;Banker et al, 2004;Fӓre et al, 2006;Primont and Domazlicky, 2006;Essid et al, 2010;Haelermans and Ruggiero, 2013;Essid et al, 2014). Bifulco and Bretschneider (2001) pointed out that education is a complex structure and simple form of DEA is inadequate for its efficiency evaluation.…”
Section: Efficiency In Secondary Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…evaluated the efficiency using a cost distance function and they took into account teaching, administrative and aiding staff costs Grosskopf et al (2001). andHaelermans and Ruggiero (2013) also used personnel costs and salaries in their study Heshmati (2002). applied a cost function in public schools and Banker et al (2004) employed three expenditure measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%