2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03210-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality-adjusted life years in glioma patients: a systematic review on currently available data and the lack of evidence-based utilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fatigue has been described as occurring frequently in spinal ependymoma patients, affecting up to 52% 17 . The assessed utility score using the EQ-5D questionnaire was 0.676 in our cohort, which is somewhat even lower than previously reported values of patients suffering from intracranial malignant gliomas (0.70–0.80 18 ) 19 . Interestingly, we found a significant difference in health-related quality of life between female and male patients, congruent with results presented in studies on quality of life in glioma patients, probably related to the greater dysfunction experienced by women at the same level of pain 20 – 22 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Fatigue has been described as occurring frequently in spinal ependymoma patients, affecting up to 52% 17 . The assessed utility score using the EQ-5D questionnaire was 0.676 in our cohort, which is somewhat even lower than previously reported values of patients suffering from intracranial malignant gliomas (0.70–0.80 18 ) 19 . Interestingly, we found a significant difference in health-related quality of life between female and male patients, congruent with results presented in studies on quality of life in glioma patients, probably related to the greater dysfunction experienced by women at the same level of pain 20 – 22 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Fatigue has been described as occurring frequently in spinal ependymoma patients, affecting up to 52% [18]. The assessed utility score using the EQ-5D questionnaire was 0.676 in our cohort, which is somewhat lower than previously reported values of patients suffering from intracranial malignant gliomas (0.70-0.80 [19]) [20]. Interestingly, we found a signi cant difference in health-related quality of life between female and male patients, congruent with results presented in studies on quality of life in glioma patients, probably related to the greater dysfunction experienced by women at the same level of pain [21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The cost of care and management of a patient with glioma is comprised of the sum of the costs of imaging, laboratory work, surgical resection, pathology analysis, sequencing when available, radiation therapy (RT), concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), adjuvant TMZ, additional systemic treatments including novel interventions, lost wages for sick patients, and additional surgical intervention and/or additional RT as well as the cost of supportive care. Cost-effectiveness studies in glioma have previously examined several aspects of glioma care [ 74 ], including notably surgical intervention [ 75 ], chemotherapy and radiation [ 76 ], and novel interventions including imaging [ 77 , 78 ]. Molecular pathology has emerged as perhaps the single most important feature of discussion in tumor boards given both its relationship to outcomes and the potential for its leverage in altering management.…”
Section: The Cost Of Care and Omics In Gliomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this period, they identified a total cost of GBP 1978 to GBP 26,980, with neuropathology (GBP 434) and chemotherapy (GBP 440) representing a relatively smaller proportion of the cost and radiotherapy (GBP 8832) the largest [ 74 ]. In more recent studies, however, authors note the difficulties in carrying out cost analyses given the lack of QALY as the outcome measure and the prevalent use of overall survival or life years gained (LYG) [ 75 ], as well as the lack of quality of life values for specific health statuses or utilities [ 75 ]. A more recent study examining the cost of care in 13 countries in a global context confirms these limitations in determining the cost of care in glioma [ 81 ].…”
Section: The Cost Of Care and Omics In Gliomamentioning
confidence: 99%