2018
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.18.00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality-Adjusted Life Years After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract: Background:The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is the preferred outcome measurement for cost-effectiveness analysis in health care. QALYs measure patient health-related quality of life with use of a value between 0 and 1. Few studies have provided original data delineating QALYs after hip and knee arthroplasty. In the present study, we evaluated patient utility preoperatively and 2 years after total hip arthroplasty, hip resurfacing, revision hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, unicompartmental knee a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
64
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
64
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing prevalence of OA during the last decades emphasizes the importance of more effective preventive and/or therapeutic strategies based on reliable diagnostic and prognostic markers [3]. In late-stage OA, joint replacement is mostly the last effective treatment option to alleviate pain and loss of functionality (including joint stiffness) in order to improve the quality of life [4]. While hip and knee arthroplasty are highly successful and cost-effective in most cases [5], about 10% to 20% of patients do not benefit much from this surgical approach, an aspect which is still insufficiently understood [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing prevalence of OA during the last decades emphasizes the importance of more effective preventive and/or therapeutic strategies based on reliable diagnostic and prognostic markers [3]. In late-stage OA, joint replacement is mostly the last effective treatment option to alleviate pain and loss of functionality (including joint stiffness) in order to improve the quality of life [4]. While hip and knee arthroplasty are highly successful and cost-effective in most cases [5], about 10% to 20% of patients do not benefit much from this surgical approach, an aspect which is still insufficiently understood [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain and loss of function are the predominant symptoms that lead to treatment, including non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical approaches [4]. The eventual treatment for end-stage hip osteoarthritis is joint replacement surgery, which is a very successful operation in terms of clinical outcomes [5][6][7] and cost-effectiveness [8,9]. However, surgery still presents major risks and complications such as dislocation, blood clots and infection [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary hip and knee arthroplasties are increasingly common orthopaedic surgical interventions that improve patients’ quality of life. 1 The UK National Joint Registry (NJR) reported over 200,000 primary hip and knee arthroplasties carried out in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man in 2018, with further increases predicted with time. 2 In the USA, a similar trend is observed with a projected increase of 145% and 147% for total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) respectively by the year 2030.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%