2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.admp.2022.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualité de vie professionnelle et résilience chez les professionnels de santé en Tunisie au cours de la pandémie à COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been identified as an independent predictor of secondary traumatic stress. This is in concordance with previous studies suggesting that women experienced greater psychological vulnerability compared to men during this pandemic [ 25 , 31 ]. In addition, a study conducted by Liu et al that analyzed the difference of post traumatic secondary stress prevalence in gender during Covid-19 outbreak in China demonstrated that female healthcare professionals were more susceptible to have re-experiencing symptoms than men [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It has also been identified as an independent predictor of secondary traumatic stress. This is in concordance with previous studies suggesting that women experienced greater psychological vulnerability compared to men during this pandemic [ 25 , 31 ]. In addition, a study conducted by Liu et al that analyzed the difference of post traumatic secondary stress prevalence in gender during Covid-19 outbreak in China demonstrated that female healthcare professionals were more susceptible to have re-experiencing symptoms than men [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, compassion satisfaction was found to be a determinant factor of BO. These findings confirm those of the one similar Tunisian study that used the same valid tools [ 25 ]. Indeed, some prior studies conducted in Spain and Saudi Arabia strongly supported this hypothesis [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations