2001
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7310.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative study of pilot payment aimed at increasing general practitioners' antismoking advice to smokers

Abstract: Objectives To elicit general practitioners' and practice nurses' accounts of changes in their clinical practice or practice organisation made to claim a pilot health promotion payment. To describe attitudes towards the piloted and previous health promotion payments. Design Qualitative, semistructured interview study. Setting 13 general practices in Leicester. Participants 18 general practitioners and 13 practice nurses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Payments that are linked to individual patient outcomes -for example, €x per successful quitter -do not appear to be associated with increased provision of cessation advice (based on patient recall and GP self-report). 54,55 It is possible that such payment schemes may encourage data manipulation and tokenistic activity. There is evidence from patient and prescription data that reducing or removing the cost of pharmacological treatments for cessation can increase GPs' prescribing or recommending of such treatments, 53,56 although some GPs are ambivalent about recommending NRT products.…”
Section: Structural Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Payments that are linked to individual patient outcomes -for example, €x per successful quitter -do not appear to be associated with increased provision of cessation advice (based on patient recall and GP self-report). 54,55 It is possible that such payment schemes may encourage data manipulation and tokenistic activity. There is evidence from patient and prescription data that reducing or removing the cost of pharmacological treatments for cessation can increase GPs' prescribing or recommending of such treatments, 53,56 although some GPs are ambivalent about recommending NRT products.…”
Section: Structural Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Poor ascertainment and low levels of reporting to the national congenital anomaly system at the Office for National Statistics in England and Wales is, as Elliott et al say, well recognised.…”
Section: Local Registers Provide More Accurate Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The potential press interest in the article by Elliott et al on birth defects and landfill sites is noted, and a thoughtful and balanced editorial by McNamee and Dolk accompanies the paper. 2 3 The relevant paragraph in This week in the BMJ then carries the headline: "People living near landfill sites have an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes."…”
Section: News Stories Were Handled Badlymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations