2013
DOI: 10.4236/health.2013.58a3010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative studies of obesity: A review of methodology

Abstract: BACKGROUND: There is a developing interest in qualitative research to understand the perspectives and experiences of people living with obesity. However, obesity is a stigmatised condition associated with negative stereotypes. Social contexts emphasizing large body size as a problem, including research interviews, may amplify obesity stigma. This study reviews the methodology employed by qualitative studies in which study participants were obese and data collection involved face-to-face interviews. METHODS: Da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The researcher, a clinical psychologist specialized in qualitative methods, was familiar with the context. The transcription data were analysed using thematic content analysis [29].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher, a clinical psychologist specialized in qualitative methods, was familiar with the context. The transcription data were analysed using thematic content analysis [29].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semistructured interviews prompts based on existing evidence, and the advanced interviewing techniques of the researches supported the collection of quality interview dialogue (35). Rigour was also enhance by addressing of methodological issues raised about previous studies with people with obesity (32).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligible patients were then invited to participate in one of six scheduled focus groups stratified by gender (self-identified as “male” or “female”). As obesity is a stigmatized condition [ 37 ], we anticipated that participants would be more comfortable in gender-specific groups [ 38 ]. We also attempted to stratify participants by referral/attendance to the MOVE!…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%