Qualitative Studies in Special Education

Abstract

An overview of the many types of studies that fall into the qualitative design genre is provided. Strategies that qualitative researchers use to establish the authors' studies as credible and trustworthy are listed and defined. So that readers will recognize the important contribution qualitative studies have made in the field of special education, a range of well-known and lesser known examples of qualitative research are reviewed. The quality indicators that are important in conducting and evaluating qualitative research are identified. Finally, as an example of the evidence that can be produced using qualitative methods, the authors provide a summary of how 3 studies have provided important information that can be used to inform policy and practice.

Developing Technology Supported Instructional Activities in a Class of Middle School Students with Intellectual Disability

“…Nitel araştırmalar için önerilen geçerlik ve güvenirlik ilkeleri doğrultusunda bu çalışmada alınan önlemler şöyledir (Brantlinger, Jimenez, Klingner, Pugach ve Richardson, 2005;Güler, Halıcıoğlu ve Taşğın, 2013, s. 333;Merriam, 2013, s. 206;Uzuner, 2005, s. 8 …”

What is the Best Strategy “Evidence-Based Practice” to Teach Literacy Skills for Students with Multiple Disabilities? A Systematic Review

“…It involves the application of directed-inquiry chart in answering questions, especially in social studies and science. Some studies that have successfully used this method are Jimenez et al (2012) and Bethune and Wood (2013).…”

Parent and Teacher Perspectives on Friendships and Social Interactions of Secondary Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

“…Regarding quality indicators of an interview study (Brantlinger, Jiminez, Klingner, Pugach, & Richardson, 2005), we purposefully recruited and selected key stakeholders relative to the topic and screened in those who met study criteria. The interview questions were clearly worded, open-ended, and appropriate for the research questions.…”

“…We also ensured credibility, most notably through investigator triangulation and peer debriefing (Brantlinger et al, 2005). Investigator triangulation included the close collaboration of the first author and doctoral students through all stages of the research process, especially during analysis.…”