Qualitative Research into Mental Health: Reflections on Epistemology

Abstract

In 2005, the Qualitative Methods in Psychosocial Health Research Group (QMiPHR) at the University of Nottingham was established as a forum to bring together academics, researchers and practitioners with an interest in qualitative methods. The group has provided colleagues in nutrition, psychiatry, psychology, social work and sociology with a forum for discussion around the question of how qualitative research is able to contribute to understanding mental health and the development of evidence‐based treatment. As a group, we asked ourselves where we stood in relation to the use of qualitative methods in mental health. While we are unified in our view that qualitative research is important and under‐utilised in mental health research, our discussions uncovered a range of views on the underlying philosophical stance of what it means to be a qualitative researcher in mental health. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of our discussions and our view that as qualitative approaches have become more widely accepted they have largely been assimilated within the mainstream ‘medical model’ of research. In this paper, we call for researchers to re‐engage with the philosophical discussion on the role and purpose of qualitative enquiry as it applies to mental health, and for practitioners and decision‐makers to be aware of the implicit values underpinning research.

Understanding optimal human functioning – The ‘call for qual’ in exploring human flourishing and well-being

“…Furthermore, the early declaration of grounding positive psychology in the positivistic paradigm 5 (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000) may have restricted areas of inquiry via this 'dogmatic set of rules and regulations' (McDonald & O'Callaghan, 2008, p. 139). Moreover, as positivism is commonly linked to the medical model, it is here (among many other contexts) that qualitative research can aid the area to move beyond this approach and understand more in-depth experiences from the participant's own perspective (Joseph et al, 2009). It wasn't until the 'methodological revolution' of the 1960's/1970's did psychology start to see a surge of radicalization of how researchers approached knowledge formation (Gough, 2014, p. 2).…”

“…Indeed, within certain areas of psychology, qualitative and mixed-methods research is quite common (e.g. health, clinical work), with novice students and researchers garnering little recognition of the difficult historical path in which the approach has had to manoeuvre (Joseph et al, 2009). However, some researchers would argue that whilst qualitative methods (e.g.…”

Qualitative research in childhood neurodisability

“…The different approaches within qualitative research influence how data are collected, analysed, and interpreted. If researchers do not approach qualitative research with this kind of rigour, they risk conducting quantitative research with qualitative methods …”

“…If researchers do not approach qualitative research with this kind of rigour, they risk conducting quantitative research with qualitative methods. 3 In terms of the practicalities of conducting qualitative research in childhood neurodisability, coproduction is critical, such as consulting with the populations participating in the research about the best ways to approach data collection. Answering direct questions verbally will not always be possible and a range of alternative approaches may be needed.…”

Working with Families Who Experience Parental Mental Health and/or Drug and Alcohol Problems in the Context of Child Protection Concerns: Recommendations for Service Improvement

“…In particular, the aim of this study was to identify possible strategies for service improvement following a three year pilot period from the perspective of discharged clients and clinical staff. Gaining feedback from key stakeholders on service models is increasingly recognised as central to service evaluation and development (Aarons & Palinkas, 2007;Fernandez, 2007;Joseph et al, 2009;Simpson & House, 2002;Streiner, 2008).…”