Qualitative Research and Community-Based Participatory Research: Considerations for Effective Dissemination in the Peer-Reviewed Literature

Grieb, Suzanne M.; Eder, Milton; Smith, Katherine Clegg; Calhoun, Karen; Tandon, Darius

doi:10.1353/cpr.2015.0041

Cited by 19 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By contrast, guidelines for reporting on PR in the context of AIAN communities do not exist, although resources that could aid in the development of such guidelines are available. For example, articles that provide guidance for reporting on community-based participatory research have been published [119,120] and the EQUATOR Network database currently contains one set of best practices for reporting on participatory action research [121]. Efforts to develop standards, guidelines, and/or recommendations for reporting on PR could initially scaffold off these and other resources—including the principles and mechanisms that inform dominant PR approaches—in order to develop a set of flexible expectations for reporting on PR that allow for critical appraisals of and comparisons across studies while accounting for variation in research goals and community needs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review

Woodbury

Ketchum

Hiratsuka

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A scoping review was conducted to assess the state of the literature on health-related participatory research involving American Indian and Alaska Native communities. Online databases were searched for relevant articles published between 1/1/2000 and 5/31/2017. 10,000+ data points relevant to community-level engagement in and regulation of research, community research capacity and cultural adaptation were extracted from 178 articles. Community engagement varied across study components: 136 (76%) articles reported community participation in research-related meetings and other events and 49 (27%) articles reported community involvement in initiation of research. 156 (88%) articles reported use of community-level tools to guide or regulate research. 93 (52%) articles reported that community members received research-related training. 147 (82%) articles described some type of cultural adaptation. Across all articles, data points on community engagement were not reported in 3061 (40%) out of 7740 cases. Findings suggest a need for increased community engagement in early stages of the research process and for reporting guidelines for participatory research involving American Indian and Alaska Native communities. There is also need to further existing research on the impact of different components of participatory research on process and outcome measures and to develop funding mechanisms that account for the time and resource intensive nature of participatory research.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review

Woodbury

Ketchum

Hiratsuka

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Prior research explored the use of CBPR to address food insecurity within Native American communities living on a reservation in the United States ( Jernigan et al, 2012) as well as rural subsistence farmers in the highlands of Guatemala (Arnes et al, 2018), and CBPR was used to address water insecurity among rural communities living in Oaxaca, Mexico (Rowles et al, 2018). An important consideration for the use of CBPR is co-ownership of results, and researchers must be aware of best practices for authoring and disseminating the results of CBPR (Bordeaux et al, 2007;Grieb et al, 2015). A benefit of the CBPR approach is that student researchers can play an active role in all phases of the undertaking (Martinez et al, 2012).…”

Section: Community-based Participatory Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving Environmental Health Practice and Policy Through Convergence Research: A Case Study of Linked Food–Water Systems Enhancing Child Health

Oerther

Voth-Gaeddert

Divelbiss³

2019

Environmental Engineering Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Promoting access to safe drinking water or access to nutritious food, each independently contribute uniquely to positive gains in human health. Nexus analysis-a systems-based approach to study interconnection and interdependence-provides a framework to expose interactions and interventions in linked food-water systems. Interactions result in unintentional changes in efficacy or toxicity creating poorer-than-expected health outcomes while synergistic interventions targeting both ''water, sanitation, and hygiene'' as well as ''food security, nutrition, and safety'' yield greater-than-anticipated improvements in health and wellness. Herein, we describe a case study of linked food-water systems, where discovery, integration, application, and the scholarship of teaching and learning, collectively enhanced child health through convergence research-a transdisciplinary approach to solve a compelling and specific problem. The method integrates five techniques predominant in the field of health care, including: (1) community-based participatory research, (2) structured reviews, (3) mixed methods, (4) structural equation modeling, and (5) interprofessional education-at multiple study sites in east Africa, Guatemala, Brazil, and South Africa. The compelling problem explored is, ''the lack of an overarching framework to achieve improvements in interdisciplinary environmental health practice and policy,'' to ultimately solve specific problems such as, ''the eradication of childhood stunting.'' Results demonstrate that convergence research improves environmental health practice and policy by exposing insights to be measured, validated, and disseminated.

show abstract

“…The journal organizers identified 13 themes within this domain, significantly above the average of almost eight themes per domain. Practical Tools themes for further focus included “resources/tools to develop community partner skills” and “resources regarding evaluation strategies.” A review of the published manuscripts reveals an interest in disseminating research findings, 33–35 influencing policy and policy makers, 36,37 developing engagement initiatives and partnerships, 38–41 improving involvement in the ethical assessment of research, 42,43 and community awareness of environmental issues. 44–46 The Practical Tools domain also introduced the Community–Campus Partnership for Health supported CES4Health innovation, establishing a peer-reviewed alternative to publication in a journal for sharing products generated by community-engaged health research.…”

Section: Qualitative Data Related To the Journal’s Vision And Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Retrospective on the Vision for Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

Eder

Holzer²,

Calhoun³

et al. 2017

Progress in Community Health Partnerships

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The organizers founded Progress in Community Health Partnerships with a commitment to improving our understanding of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and its use in community–academic/institutional health partnerships. Following Rogers’s Diffusion of Innovations, they reasoned that expanded adoption would occur through academic and community partner recognition of CBPR’s relative advantage over previous approaches; its compatibility with the values, past experience and needs of potential adopters; its ease of understanding and use; its capacity for experimentation and refinement; and its production of observable results. We now assess the journal’s progress toward realizing the vision, as well as issues and problems the organizers identified. We map the journal’s content over its first decade onto the initial vision by examining the record of submissions and publications across the eight types of articles and the journal’s record of rejections and publications. In remembering that Rogers’s study of innovations requires both technical and social change, we discuss the difference between understanding how to do something and actually putting an innovation into action that becomes standard practice at both individual and systemic levels. We observe that the large number of Original Research and Works-in-Progress/Lessons Learned manuscripts, submitted and published, reflect traditional expectations for faculty research productivity. We suggest that sustainability, which rated of lower importance within the initial vision, has gained in importance among community and academic partners; however, it will gain added attention only with changed university expectations of researchers. We further suggest that the study of partnerships involved in researching and improving public health should be expanded beyond the current focus on CBPR.

show abstract

Qualitative Research and Community-Based Participatory Research: Considerations for Effective Dissemination in the Peer-Reviewed Literature

Abstract: Qualitative research approaches have tremendous potential to integrate community and researcher perspectives to inform community health research findings. Effective dissemination of CBPR informed qualitative research findings is crucial to advancing health disparities research.

Cited by 19 publications

References 24 publications

Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review

Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review

Improving Environmental Health Practice and Policy Through Convergence Research: A Case Study of Linked Food–Water Systems Enhancing Child Health

A Retrospective on the Vision for Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About