2020
DOI: 10.1177/1049732320921143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Methods in Health Policy and Systems Research: A Framework for Study Planning

Abstract: Qualitative methodologies and methods are commonly used in health policy and systems research but have not been extensively characterized. We describe how qualitative approaches are used within the field and present a framework to aid researchers in study planning. To achieve these aims, we conducted a scoping literature review of 1 year of selected health policy and systems research and then coded publications based on their primary analytical foci. Four core themes emerged: policy or program content, an anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also important for researchers from various fields who attempt to carry out and evaluate such changes [108]. Using study typology of Fisher and Hamer, conducted research could be included in policy and program environment study type [109] typical for the governance model of Public Management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important for researchers from various fields who attempt to carry out and evaluate such changes [108]. Using study typology of Fisher and Hamer, conducted research could be included in policy and program environment study type [109] typical for the governance model of Public Management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sessions were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim using professional transcription services. This study format adhered to a conventional qualitative design for medical settings and systems (29)(30)(31) and team-based analysis approaches (32,33).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken over the entire process of data collection, this creates space for situated reflexivity across diverse research teams and for engagement with iterative work among differently positioned stakeholders from different methodological backgrounds. The sharing of field reports, the facilitation of member checking across the team (Brear, 2020), and the circulation of process memos prepared by ethnographers and others can build a more reliable and robust collective investment in iterative processes. By working together from the early stages of research, field notes can be distilled in briefs and interim reports that are both interdisciplinarily legible and retain the unique perspective offered by ethnographic engagement.…”
Section: Challenges For Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%