Qualitative Versus Quantitative Research 2017
DOI: 10.5772/67848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Method Versus Quantitative Method in Marketing Research: An Application Example at Oba Restaurant

Abstract: The aim of this chapter is to present the unique aspects of the qualitative method that is rarely used against the quantitative method commonly used to obtain valid and reliable information in marketing research today. In this section, the qualitative method and the specific nature of the quantitative method are dealt with through an application beyond a theoretical-based debate. In this context, a marketing research has been conducted on how to improve the quality of service of a restaurant operation that wan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the reliability tests, Cronbach’s alphas served as an indicator for measuring the internal consistency of the survey with a threshold of 0.7 [ 83 ]. The adequate reliability could reveal that items reflect similar observations under similar scenarios with similar participants [ 84 ]. For validity tests, unidimensionality validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity served as indicators for confirmative factor analysis [ 85 ], which measures the degree of association between a claimed factor and its operationalization, as depicted in Table 4 .…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reliability tests, Cronbach’s alphas served as an indicator for measuring the internal consistency of the survey with a threshold of 0.7 [ 83 ]. The adequate reliability could reveal that items reflect similar observations under similar scenarios with similar participants [ 84 ]. For validity tests, unidimensionality validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity served as indicators for confirmative factor analysis [ 85 ], which measures the degree of association between a claimed factor and its operationalization, as depicted in Table 4 .…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cronbach's alphas evaluate the internal consistency of the survey with a threshold of 0.7, as shown in Table 3. Results showed all the factors achieved a satisfactory level of reliability [88]. Similarly, construct validity shows the degree of association between a claimed factor and its operationalization, which included three parts: unidimensionality validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysis Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Open-ended questions were asked to the participants during semi-structured interviews. The questions were prepared according to the literature (Andaleeb & Conway, 2006;Bilgin, 2017). While developing the question types, suggestions of King, Horrocks, and Brooks (2011, p. 65) were taken into account.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%