Qualitative management accounting research: rationale, pitfalls and potential

Abstract

Purpose -The paper aims to provide an overview of the rationale for qualitative research in management accounting. It discusses how qualitative research could serve the development of theory, and provides guiding principles for qualitative investigation. It also seeks to identify common problems in qualitative studies and lays out avenues for further qualitative inquiry. Design/methodology/approach -The paper relies on critical reflection and deductive logic in its discussion, drawing on a wide range of theoretical pronouncements and methodological literature, as well as on some illustrative field studies in management accounting. Findings -The paper opens a broad panorama: it emphasizes field research as a necessary counterweight to textbook appreciations of management accounting, to idealized economic models and to consultancy-oriented agenda. It identifies how field research serves theory development in different ways, providing a set of practical principles which assist qualitative efforts. The paper also specifies pitfalls in qualitative studies and shows areas where the future potential of qualitative investigations can be focused. Practical implications -This is a paper that motivates the "qualitative" management accounting scholar. But it also assists in a pragmatic way the qualitatively oriented management accounting scholar -especially someone with little prior experience in empirical fieldwork and in the theoretical interpretation of qualitative data. Originality/value -The paper provides a source of inspiration, an instructive reflection and a practical guide for the qualitatively oriented, but still somewhat hesitant, management accounting scholar.

Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems

“…This had several purposes, which included tying interviews to the specific context, comparing, substantiating and/or questioning interview data, providing a richer case study, and gathering further data on the information system (Irvine and Gaffikin 2006;McKinnon 1988;Vaivio 2008).…”

Conflicting interests but filtered key targets: Stakeholder and resource-dependency analyses at a University of Applied Sciences

“…We have utilized several data sources to increase the reliability of the results ( McKinnon, 1988;Sundin et al, 2010;Vaivio, 2008). First, we utilized several different types of data including annual reports, public documents (i.e., the web-pages of UAS and Ministry of Education and Culture, Finnish acts and laws, Finnish statistics, newspapers), internal documents (i.e., financial statements, quality assurance manual, performance measurement reports), personal e-mails (sent to all employees by researchers), interviews and direct observation.…”

Institutional pluralism, two publics theory and performance reporting practices in Zambia’s health sector

“…This study adopted a qualitative methodological approach that is consistent with interpretive research (Vaivio, 2008). The research methodology was guided by the study's conceptual framework in terms of how institutional pluralism and the theory of two publics may produce diverse social values among different stakeholders regarding accounting and performance reporting practices.…”