Proceedings of SLPAT 2015: 6th Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies 2015
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w15-5107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative investigation of the display of speech recognition results for communication with deaf people

Abstract: Speech technologies provide ways of helping people with hearing loss by improving their autonomy. This study focuses on an application in French language which is developed in the collaborative project RAPSODIE in order to improve communication between a hearing person and a deaf or hardof-hearing person. Our goal is to investigate different ways of displaying the speech recognition results which takes also into account the reliability of the recognized items. In this qualitative study, 10 persons have been in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I think there should be a hierarchy in captions based on the importance to understand the video content. And I should be able to control the level of details in captions... " In terms of caption presentations, our interviewees also complained about existing presentation styles, such as font size [56], font color [60], and underlining [70], which is pre-defined by individual content creators. Five interviewees expressed strong preferences for controlling the changes of caption appearances and the correlation between the changes and the meaning of the changes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I think there should be a hierarchy in captions based on the importance to understand the video content. And I should be able to control the level of details in captions... " In terms of caption presentations, our interviewees also complained about existing presentation styles, such as font size [56], font color [60], and underlining [70], which is pre-defined by individual content creators. Five interviewees expressed strong preferences for controlling the changes of caption appearances and the correlation between the changes and the meaning of the changes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, background noise, multi-talker speech, human accent, and disfluent speech may further downgrade the quality of automatic captions [3,18,54]. To make automatic captions work better, prior work explored the approaches such as removing the noise from the environment and changing the appearances of the automatic captions to convey ASR confidence [4] (e.g., alternating the font size [56], font color [60], and underlining [70]). Although these features were studied with DHH participants, they have not been fully integrated into video-sharing platforms, so it is unknown what the platform users will think of them in a practical scenario.…”
Section: Existing Captioning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, there have been little research about how to format transcriptions for this particular audience (e.g. highlighting keywords [4], [9]). Furthermore, despite ASR systems good performance, decoding errors are still problematic for captions comprehension [8], especially for students who are deaf who "do not read by 'sounding the words out'".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-mentioned problems can be solved by involving the assistive technology as it can be used as an interpreter for converting the sign languages into text or speech for better communication between the Deaf community and hearing individuals [12]. Other technologies such as speech technologies can assist in different ways to help people with hearing loss by improving their autonomy [13]. A common example of speech technology is speech recognition, also termed as automatic speech recognition (ASR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%